Suppr超能文献

雾化消旋肾上腺素用于新生儿拔管

Nebulized racemic epinephrine for extubation of newborn infants.

作者信息

Davies M W, Davis P G

机构信息

Grantley Stable Neonatal Unit, Royal Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4029.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD000506. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000506.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following a period of mechanical ventilation, post-extubation upper airway obstruction can occur in newborn infants, especially after prolonged, traumatic or multiple intubations. The subsequent increase in upper airway resistance may lead to respiratory insufficiency and failure of extubation. The vasoconstrictive properties of epinephrine, and its proven efficacy in the treatment of croup in infants, has led to the routine use of inhaled nebulized epinephrine immediately post-extubation in some neonatal units. It is also recommended for neonates with post-extubation tracheal obstruction and stridor in neonatal and respiratory textbooks and reviews.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess whether nebulized epinephrine administered immediately after extubation in neonates weaned from IPPV decreases the need for subsequent additional respiratory support.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were of: MEDLINE from 1966 to September 2000; CINAHL from 1982 to September 2000; Current Contents from 1994 to September 2000; and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2000). These searches were updated to September 2001 for this review update. Previous searches up to March 1999 included the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, expert informants and journal hand searching mainly in the English language, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, and conference and symposia proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised control trials in which nebulized epinephrine was compared with placebo immediately post-extubation in newborn infants who have been weaned from IPPV and extubated, with regard to clinically important outcomes (i.e. need for additional respiratory support, increase in oxygen requirement, respiratory distress, stridor or the occurrence of side effects).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No studies met our criteria for inclusion in this review.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies were identified which looked at the effect of inhaled nebulized epinephrine on clinically important outcomes in infants being extubated.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is no evidence either supporting or refuting the use of inhaled nebulized racemic epinephrine in newborn infants.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

randomised controlled trials are needed comparing inhaled nebulized racemic epinephrine with placebo in neonates post-extubation. This should be looked at both as a routine treatment post-extubation and as specific treatment for post-extubation upper airway obstruction. Study populations should include the group of infants at highest risk for upper airway obstruction from mucosal swelling because of their small glottic and sub-glottic diameters (ie those infants with birthweights less than 1000 grams).

摘要

背景

在经历一段时间的机械通气后,新生儿尤其是在长时间、创伤性或多次插管后,拔管后可能会发生上呼吸道梗阻。随后上呼吸道阻力增加可能导致呼吸功能不全和拔管失败。肾上腺素的血管收缩特性及其在治疗婴儿喉炎方面已证实的疗效,导致一些新生儿病房在拔管后立即常规使用雾化吸入肾上腺素。在新生儿和呼吸领域的教科书及综述中,也推荐用于拔管后气管梗阻和喘鸣的新生儿。

目的

主要目的是评估在从间歇正压通气撤机并拔管的新生儿中,拔管后立即雾化吸入肾上腺素是否可减少后续对额外呼吸支持的需求。

检索策略

检索了以下数据库:1966年至2000年9月的MEDLINE;1982年至2000年9月的CINAHL;1994年至2000年9月的《现刊目次》;以及Cochrane对照试验注册库(Cochrane图书馆2000年第3期)。本次综述更新时,这些检索更新至2001年9月。截至1999年3月的先前检索包括围产期试验牛津数据库、专家咨询以及主要以英文进行的期刊手工检索,先前的综述包括交叉参考文献、摘要以及会议和研讨会论文集。

入选标准

所有随机和半随机对照试验,其中在从间歇正压通气撤机并拔管的新生儿中,拔管后立即将雾化吸入肾上腺素与安慰剂进行比较,观察临床重要结局(即对额外呼吸支持的需求、氧需求增加、呼吸窘迫、喘鸣或副作用的发生)。

数据收集与分析

没有研究符合我们纳入本综述的标准。

主要结果

未发现有研究观察雾化吸入肾上腺素对拔管婴儿临床重要结局的影响。

对实践的启示

没有证据支持或反驳在新生儿中使用雾化吸入消旋肾上腺素。

对研究的启示

需要进行随机对照试验,比较雾化吸入消旋肾上腺素与安慰剂在新生儿拔管后的效果。这应作为拔管后的常规治疗以及拔管后上呼吸道梗阻的特异性治疗来研究。研究人群应包括因声门和声门下直径小而黏膜肿胀导致上呼吸道梗阻风险最高的婴儿组(即出生体重小于1000克的婴儿)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验