Suppr超能文献

缓释文拉法辛治疗老年广泛性焦虑障碍:五项随机安慰剂对照临床试验的汇总分析

Venlafaxine ER as a treatment for generalized anxiety disorder in older adults: pooled analysis of five randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials.

作者信息

Katz Ira R, Reynolds Charles F, Alexopoulos George S, Hackett David

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Jan;50(1):18-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50003.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Concerns about the safety of benzodiazepines in older adults may have led investigators and clinicians to underestimate the importance of adequately treating generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in later life. To evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of an alternative treatment in older patients, we conducted a secondary analysis of five randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of extended release venlafaxine (venlafaxine ER, Effexor XR) for adult patients with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) diagnosis of GAD.

DESIGN

The five multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, prospectively randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials used similar designs to evaluate short-term efficacy after 8 weeks. In addition, two studies evaluated efficacy and safety over 24 weeks under double-blind conditions.

SETTING

Outpatients from both primary care and specialty mental healthcare settings were included. Three studies were conducted in the United States and two in Europe.

PARTICIPANTS

Intention-to-treat analyses included 1,839 adult outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of GAD and total scores of > or =18 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA). Ten percent of the patients were aged 60 and older and 5.0% were aged 65 and older.

INTERVENTION

Fixed or flexible doses of venlafaxine ER in the dose range of 37.5 to 225 mg/day or matched placebo were used for 8 weeks in all studies and for 24 weeks in two studies.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary efficacy variables included the HAMA total score and psychic anxiety factor, the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale, and the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I). Secondary efficacy variables included the HAMA somatic anxiety factor, the depression subscale of the HAD, CGI-3 severity, the Covi Scale for Anxiety, and the Raskin Scale for Depression.

RESULTS

On the CGI, 66% of older patients (> or =60 years) responded to venlafaxine ER, compared with 41% for placebo (P <.01 by logistic regression). For younger patients (<60 years), comparable figures were 67% and 44%, respectively (P <.001). Analysis of variance showed no main effects for age and no age-by-treatment interactions for any of the primary or secondary efficacy outcome measures for either the 8- or 24-week analyses. Within the older adults subgroup, increasing age did not influence responses. In this cohort of GAD patients, higher levels of depression were associated with decreased responses of anxiety symptoms. In older adults, 23% of venlafaxine ER patients discontinued treatment prematurely versus 31% of those who received placebo; comparable figures for younger adult patients were 27% and 28%, respectively. Discontinuations due to adverse events were 15% versus 14% for venlafaxine ER and placebo, respectively, in older adults compared with 15% versus 8%, respectively, for younger adults.

CONCLUSION

Venlafaxine ER is equally safe and well tolerated by and shows similar efficacy in younger and older patients in the treatment of GAD.

摘要

目的

对苯二氮䓬类药物在老年人中安全性的担忧,可能导致研究者和临床医生低估了充分治疗老年人广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的重要性。为评估一种替代治疗方法在老年患者中的安全性和疗效,我们对五项随机、安慰剂对照的缓释文拉法辛(文拉法辛缓释剂,怡诺思缓释胶囊)治疗《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)诊断为GAD的成年患者的临床试验进行了二次分析。

设计

这五项多中心、平行组、双盲、前瞻性随机、安慰剂对照临床试验采用相似设计评估8周后的短期疗效。此外,两项研究在双盲条件下评估了24周的疗效和安全性。

地点

纳入了来自初级保健和专科精神卫生保健机构的门诊患者。三项研究在美国进行,两项在欧洲进行。

参与者

意向性分析纳入了1839例DSM-IV诊断为GAD且汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)总分≥18分的成年门诊患者。10%的患者年龄在60岁及以上,5.0%的患者年龄在65岁及以上。

干预

在所有研究中,使用37.5至225mg/天剂量范围的固定或灵活剂量的文拉法辛缓释剂或匹配的安慰剂治疗8周,两项研究中治疗24周。

测量

主要疗效变量包括HAMA总分和精神性焦虑因子、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)的焦虑分量表以及临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)。次要疗效变量包括HAMA躯体性焦虑因子、HAD的抑郁分量表、CGI-3严重程度、科维焦虑量表以及拉斯金抑郁量表。

结果

在CGI量表上,66%的老年患者(≥60岁)对文拉法辛缓释剂有反应,而安慰剂组为41%(经逻辑回归分析,P<0.01)。对于年轻患者(<60岁),相应数字分别为67%和44%(P<0.001)。方差分析显示,在8周或24周分析中,年龄对任何主要或次要疗效指标均无主效应,年龄与治疗之间也无交互作用。在老年亚组中,年龄增长并不影响疗效。在这组GAD患者中,抑郁程度较高与焦虑症状反应降低相关。在老年人中,23%的文拉法辛缓释剂治疗患者提前停药,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者为31%;年轻成年患者的相应数字分别为27%和28%。老年人中因不良事件停药的比例,文拉法辛缓释剂组为15%,安慰剂组为14%,而年轻成年人中分别为15%和8%。

结论

文拉法辛缓释剂在治疗GAD方面,在年轻和老年患者中安全性相当、耐受性良好且疗效相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验