Kalady Matthew F, Clary Bryan M, Clark Lisa A, Gottfried Marcia, Rohren Eric M, Coleman R Edward, Pappas Theodore N, Tyler Douglas S
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Oct;9(8):799-806. doi: 10.1007/BF02574503.
This study examined the effect that 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) imaging had on the clinical management of patients with suspected periampullary malignancy.
Fifty-four patients with suspected pancreatic neoplasms underwent both whole-body (18)FDG-PET and abdominal computed tomography (CT). Malignant or benign disease was confirmed pathologically in 47 patients.
Of the 41 patients with malignancy, (18)FDG-PET failed to identify the primary tumor in 5 patients. (18)FDG-PET demonstrated increased uptake suggesting primary malignancy in 37 patients. Malignant pathology was confirmed in 36 cases. (18)FDG-PET identified malignant locoregional lymph node metastases in six of ten patients. All nodes identified before surgery by (18)FDG-PET were also seen on preoperative CT. Six patients who were thought to have resectable disease by CT were found to have distant metastasis at laparotomy. (18)FDG-PET did not detect metastasis in any of these cases. Before surgery, (18)FDG-PET identified distant metastases that were not detected by CT in one patient.
Despite high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing periampullary malignancy, (18)FDG-PET did not change clinical management in the vast majority of patients previously evaluated by CT. In addition, (18)FDG-PET missed >10% of periampullary malignancies and did not provide the anatomical detail necessary to define unresectabilty.
本研究探讨了18-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描((18)FDG-PET)成像对疑似壶腹周围恶性肿瘤患者临床管理的影响。
54例疑似胰腺肿瘤患者接受了全身(18)FDG-PET和腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)检查。47例患者的恶性或良性疾病经病理证实。
在41例恶性肿瘤患者中,(18)FDG-PET未能识别出5例患者的原发肿瘤。(18)FDG-PET显示37例患者摄取增加,提示原发性恶性肿瘤。36例经病理证实为恶性病变。(18)FDG-PET在10例患者中的6例中识别出恶性局部区域淋巴结转移。术前经(18)FDG-PET识别的所有淋巴结在术前CT上也可见。6例CT检查认为可切除的患者在剖腹手术时发现有远处转移。(18)FDG-PET在这些病例中均未检测到转移。术前,(18)FDG-PET在1例患者中识别出CT未检测到的远处转移。
尽管(18)FDG-PET在诊断壶腹周围恶性肿瘤方面具有较高的敏感性和特异性,但在绝大多数先前接受过CT评估的患者中,(18)FDG-PET并未改变临床管理。此外,(18)FDG-PET漏诊了>10%的壶腹周围恶性肿瘤,且未提供定义不可切除性所需的解剖细节。