De Castro Victor, Godet Gilles, Mencia Gonzalo, Raux Mathieu, Coriat Pierre
Department of Anesthesiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jan;96(1):33-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200301000-00008.
Remifentanil is a potent ultra-short-acting opioid, which permits rapid emergence. However, remifentanil is expensive and may have detrimental effects on hemodynamics in case of overdose. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) permits adapting infusion to pharmacokinetic models. In this prospective randomized study, we compared intra- and postoperative hemodynamics, remifentanil requirement during anesthesia, and postoperative morphine requirement in patients scheduled for carotid surgery, and receiving either continuous IV weight-adjusted infusion of remifentanil (RIVA) or TCI for remifentanil (TCIR). Forty-six patients were enrolled in this study: all were anesthetized by using TCI for propofol. Twenty-three received RIVA (0.5 micro g. kg(-1) x min(-1)) for the induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, with the infusion rate decreased to 0.25 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) after intubation, then adapted by step of 0.05 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) according to hemodynamics. Twenty-three patients received TCIR (Minto model, Rugloop), with an effect-site concentration at 4 ng/mL during induction, then adapted by step of 1 ng/mL according to hemodynamics. All patients received atracurium and a 50% mixture of N(2)O/O(2). Hemodynamic variables were recorded each minute. The number and duration of hemodynamic events were collected, and total doses of anesthetics (remifentanil and propofol) and vasoactive drugs were noted in both groups of patients. Data were analyzed by using unpaired t-tests. RIVA was significantly associated with more frequent episodes of intraoperative hypotension (16 versus 6, P < 0.001) and more frequent episodes of postoperative hypertension and/or tachycardia requiring more frequent administration of beta-adrenergic blockers (16 vs 10, P < 0.04) in comparison with TCIR. The need for morphine titration was not significantly different between groups. TCIR led to a significantly smaller requirement of remifentanil (700 +/- 290 versus 1390 +/- 555 micro g, P < 0.001) without difference in propofol requirement. This prospective randomized study demonstrated that, during carotid endarterectomy, in comparison with patients receiving remifentanil using continuous RIVA, TCI results in less hypotensive episodes during the induction of anesthesia, in fewer episodes of tachycardia and/or hypertension and a smaller beta-adrenergic blocker requirement during recovery, and a decrease in remifentanil requirement. Recommendations to prefer TCI for remifentanil administration during carotid endarterectomy may be justified.
Remifentanil for intraoperative analgesia in carotid artery surgery is associated with a better stability in perioperative hemodynamics when administered in target-controlled infusion compared with continuous weight-adjusted infusion. This may be related to a smaller requirement of this drug when using target-controlled infusion, as well as a smooth mode of administration.
瑞芬太尼是一种强效超短效阿片类药物,可实现快速苏醒。然而,瑞芬太尼价格昂贵,过量使用时可能对血流动力学产生不利影响。靶控输注(TCI)可使输注适应药代动力学模型。在这项前瞻性随机研究中,我们比较了计划接受颈动脉手术的患者在术中和术后的血流动力学、麻醉期间瑞芬太尼的需求量以及术后吗啡的需求量,这些患者接受持续静脉注射按体重调整剂量的瑞芬太尼(RIVA)或瑞芬太尼靶控输注(TCIR)。46例患者纳入本研究:所有患者均采用丙泊酚靶控输注进行麻醉。23例患者在麻醉诱导和气管插管时接受RIVA(0.5μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹),插管后输注速率降至0.25μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹,然后根据血流动力学情况以0.05μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹的步长进行调整。23例患者接受TCIR(Minto模型,Rugloop),诱导期间效应室浓度为4ng/mL,然后根据血流动力学情况以1ng/mL的步长进行调整。所有患者均接受阿曲库铵和50%的N₂O/O₂混合气体。每分钟记录血流动力学变量。收集血流动力学事件的数量和持续时间,并记录两组患者麻醉药(瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚)和血管活性药物的总剂量。采用非配对t检验分析数据。与TCIR相比,RIVA与术中低血压发作更频繁(16次对6次,P<0.001)以及术后高血压和/或心动过速发作更频繁相关,需要更频繁地使用β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂(16次对10次,P<0.04)。两组之间吗啡滴定的需求无显著差异。TCIR导致瑞芬太尼需求量显著减少(700±290μg对1390±555μg,P<0.001),而丙泊酚需求量无差异。这项前瞻性随机研究表明,在颈动脉内膜切除术中,与接受持续RIVA使用瑞芬太尼的患者相比,TCI导致麻醉诱导期间低血压发作减少、恢复期间心动过速和/或高血压发作减少以及β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂需求量减少,并且瑞芬太尼需求量降低。在颈动脉内膜切除术中优先选择TCI进行瑞芬太尼给药的建议可能是合理的。
与持续按体重调整输注相比,在颈动脉手术中采用靶控输注方式给予瑞芬太尼进行术中镇痛,围手术期血流动力学稳定性更好。这可能与使用靶控输注时该药物需求量较小以及给药方式平稳有关。