Ohlsson A, Walia R, Shah S
Paediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, 775A-600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD003481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003481.
A patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) complicates the clinical course of preterm infants, increasing their risks of developing chronic lung disease (CLD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Indomethacin is used as standard therapy to close a PDA, but is associated with reduced blood flow to the brain, kidneys and gut. Ibuprofen, another cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, may be as effective with fewer side effects.
To determine the effectiveness and safety of ibuprofen compared to placebo or no intervention for closing a PDA in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. To determine the effectiveness and safety of ibuprofen compared to other cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors (including indomethacin, mefenamic acid) for closing a PDA in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.
Randomized (or quasi-randomized) controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ibuprofen to placebo or indomethacin or mefenamic acid for therapy of PDA were identified by searching the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4, 2002), MEDLINE (1996 - January 2003), CINAHL (1982 - November 2002), EMBASE (1980 - January 2002), reference lists of published RCTs and abstracts from the Pediatric Academic Societies and the European Society for Pediatric Research meetings published in Pediatric Research (1991 - 2002). No language restrictions were applied.
At least two reviewers worked independently at each step of the review, then compared results and resolved differences. Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed according to blinding of randomization, of intervention and of outcome assessment, and completeness of followup. Weighted treatment effects, calculated using Revman 4.1, included typical relative risk (RR), typical risk difference (RD), number needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH), and weighted mean difference (WMD), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed effect model was used for meta-analyses. Heterogeneity tests were performed to assess the appropriateness of pooling the data.
Eight studies including 509 patients were included. All studies compared the effectiveness of ibuprofen to indomethacin for the closure of a PDA. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity of treatment effect for any of the outcomes. For the primary outcome (failure of ductal closure), there was no statistically significant difference between ibuprofen and indomethacin groups [RR 0.92 (95% CI 0.69, 1.22)]. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, surgical duct ligation, duration of ventilator support, IVH, PVL, NEC, time to full enteral feeds, ROP, sepsis, duration of hospital stay or gastrointestinal bleed. For many of these outcomes the sample size was small and the estimates imprecise. The incidence of decreased urine output (< 1cc/kg/hr) was lower in the ibuprofen group as compared to the indomethacin group [NNT 9 (95% CI 5-14)]. This was the only statistically significant clinical finding favouring ibuprofen. Chronic lung disease defined as oxygen requirement at 28 days post-natally was statistically significantly more likely to occur in the ibuprofen group [RR 1.37 (95% CI 1.01, 1.86); NNH 7 (95% CI 3 - 100)]. No studies comparing ibuprofen versus placebo for the closure of PDA were identified.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of ibuprofen compared to indomethacin in closing the PDA. Ibuprofen reduces the risk of oliguria. However, ibuprofen may increase the risk for chronic lung disease, and pulmonary hypertension has been observed in three infants after prophylactic use of ibuprofen. Based on currently available information ibuprofen does not appear to confer a net benefit over indomethacin for the treatment of a PDA. We conclude that indomethacin should remain the drug of choice for the treatment of a PDA. Future research may include a four arm trial where infants are randomized at birth, either to a prophylaxis arm starting at birth or to an arm in which treatment starts after a PDA is diagnosed by echocardiography within the first seven days of life. Within the prophylaxis and treatment arms, the infants would be randomized to either ibuprofen or indomethacin. The primary outcome should be intact survival (survival without handicap) at 18 months corrected age.
动脉导管未闭(PDA)会使早产儿的临床病程复杂化,增加其患慢性肺病(CLD)、坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)和脑室内出血(IVH)的风险。吲哚美辛被用作关闭PDA的标准疗法,但会导致脑、肾和肠道的血流减少。布洛芬,另一种环氧化酶抑制剂,可能同样有效且副作用更少。
确定与安慰剂或不干预相比,布洛芬对早产儿和/或低出生体重儿关闭PDA的有效性和安全性。确定与其他环氧化酶抑制剂(包括吲哚美辛、甲芬那酸)相比,布洛芬对早产儿和/或低出生体重儿关闭PDA的有效性和安全性。
通过检索Cochrane对照试验注册库(2002年第4期)、MEDLINE(1996年 - 2003年1月)、CINAHL(1982年 - 2002年11月)、EMBASE(1980年 - 2002年1月)、已发表的随机对照试验的参考文献列表以及在《儿科学研究》(1991年 - 2002年)上发表的儿科学术协会和欧洲儿科学研究学会会议的摘要,识别比较布洛芬与安慰剂、吲哚美辛或甲芬那酸治疗PDA的随机(或半随机)对照试验(RCT)。未设语言限制。
1)设计:随机或半随机对照试验;2)研究对象:胎龄小于37周的早产儿或出生体重小于2500克且经临床或超声心动图诊断为PDA的婴儿;3)干预措施:给予布洛芬以关闭PDA;4)观察指标:报告以下至少一项观察指标:PDA未关闭、死亡率、手术结扎、脑室内出血(IVH)、脑室周围白质软化(PVL)、NEC、尿量减少、早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)、CLD、败血症、吸氧天数。
至少两名评价者在评价的每个步骤独立工作,然后比较结果并解决差异。根据随机化、干预措施和结果评估的盲法以及随访的完整性评估纳入研究的方法学质量。使用Revman 4.1计算加权治疗效果,包括典型相对危险度(RR)、典型危险差值(RD)、治疗所需人数(NNT)或伤害所需人数(NNH)以及加权均数差值(WMD),均带有95%置信区间(CI)。采用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。进行异质性检验以评估合并数据的适宜性。
纳入8项研究,共509例患者。所有研究均比较了布洛芬与吲哚美辛关闭PDA的有效性。对于任何观察指标,治疗效果均无统计学显著异质性。对于主要观察指标(导管未关闭),布洛芬组与吲哚美辛组之间无统计学显著差异[RR 0.92(95%CI 0.69,1.22)]。在死亡率、手术导管结扎、机械通气支持时间、IVH、PVL、NEC、完全经口喂养时间、ROP、败血症、住院时间或胃肠道出血方面无统计学显著差异。对于其中许多观察指标,样本量较小且估计值不精确。与吲哚美辛组相比,布洛芬组尿量减少(<1cc/kg/hr)的发生率较低[NNT 9(95%CI 5 - 14)]。这是唯一支持布洛芬的具有统计学显著性的临床发现。定义为出生后28天需氧的慢性肺病在布洛芬组中发生的可能性在统计学上显著更高[RR 1.37(95%CI 1.01,1.86);NNH 7(95%CI 3 - 100)]。未发现比较布洛芬与安慰剂关闭PDA的研究。
我们发现与吲哚美辛相比,布洛芬在关闭PDA的有效性方面无统计学显著差异。布洛芬可降低少尿风险。然而,布洛芬可能增加慢性肺病风险,且在3例婴儿预防性使用布洛芬后观察到肺动脉高压。基于目前可得信息,布洛芬在治疗PDA方面似乎并未比吲哚美辛带来净益处。我们得出结论,吲哚美辛应仍是治疗PDA的首选药物。未来研究可能包括一项四臂试验,婴儿在出生时随机分组,要么进入出生时开始预防的组,要么进入在出生后前7天经超声心动图诊断为PDA后开始治疗的组。在预防组和治疗组内,婴儿将随机分为接受布洛芬或吲哚美辛治疗。主要观察指标应为矫正年龄18个月时的完整存活(无残疾存活)。