Armstrong Ben G
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Epidemiology. 2003 Jul;14(4):467-72. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000071408.39011.99.
The effects of air pollution or weather on mortality may be stronger in susceptible groups. Conventional investigation of such effect modification through interaction terms in time-series regression analysis depends on hard-to-verify modeling assumptions, and can be computationally unwieldy. As an alternative, we investigate the use of case-only approaches originally proposed for studying gene-environment interactions.
We consider an investigation of whether persons of low socio-economic status (SES) are more susceptible to the effect of high outside temperatures on mortality. If low SES persons are more prevalent among deaths on hot days than on days with more moderate temperatures, then this suggests the group is more susceptible. Extending the case-only theory developed for gene-environment interactions allows this to be described more quantitatively.
Conventionally based analysis estimated that mortality in the Sao Paulo rose by 2.3% (SE 0.3%) for each degree of increase in outside temperature above 20 degrees C. This effect was greater by 1.11% (SE 0.72) in the lowest compared with highest quartile of SES. Case-only analysis estimated the difference in effect to be 1.14% (SE 0.72).
The simplicity and reduced assumptions of the case-only approach provide an advantage over conventional analysis, although the approach gives information only on modification, not main effects.
空气污染或天气对死亡率的影响在易感人群中可能更强。在时间序列回归分析中,通过交互项对这种效应修正进行传统研究依赖于难以验证的建模假设,并且计算起来可能很繁琐。作为一种替代方法,我们研究了最初为研究基因 - 环境相互作用而提出的病例对照方法的应用。
我们考虑一项关于社会经济地位(SES)较低的人群是否更容易受到外界高温对死亡率影响的调查。如果在炎热天气下死亡人群中低SES人群比在温度较为适中的日子里更为普遍,那么这表明该群体更易感。扩展为基因 - 环境相互作用而发展的病例对照理论可以更定量地描述这一情况。
传统分析估计,在圣保罗,外界温度高于20摄氏度时,每升高一度,死亡率上升2.3%(标准误0.3%)。在SES最低四分位数人群中,这种效应比最高四分位数人群大1.11%(标准误0.72)。病例对照分析估计效应差异为1.14%(标准误0.72)。
病例对照方法的简单性和较少的假设提供了优于传统分析的优势,尽管该方法仅提供关于效应修正的信息,而非主要效应。