Ljungman Per, Brand Ronald, Einsele Hermann, Frassoni Francesco, Niederwieser Dietger, Cordonnier Catherine
Department of Hematology, Huddinge University Hospital, SE-14186 Stockholm, Sweden.
Blood. 2003 Dec 15;102(13):4255-60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3263. Epub 2003 Aug 21.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). The importance of the recipient's serologic status is paramount. However, the importance of the donor's serologic status in CMV-seropositive recipients is controversial. We analyzed the influence of the donor's CMV status in a large cohort of patients. A total of 7018 patients seropositive for CMV reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) were included; 5910 patients had undergone HLA-identical sibling SCT and 1108 patients had undergone unrelated donor SCT. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazards models were constructed for survival, event-free survival, transplant-related mortality, and relapse incidence. Patients receiving grafts from CMV-seropositive HLA-identical sibling donors had the same survival as patients grafted from seronegative donors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; P =.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.14). However, unrelated donor stem cell (SC) transplant recipients receiving grafts from CMV-seropositive donors had an improved 5-year survival (35% versus 27%; HR = 0.8; P =.006), an improved event-free survival (30% versus 22%; HR = 0.8; P =.01), and a reduced transplant-related mortality (49% versus 62%; HR = 0.7; P <.001). There was no influence on the relapse incidence. The effects of donor CMV status remained in multivariate analyses. The effect of donor status was different among different disease categories. In patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), T-cell depletion abrogated the beneficial effect of donor status, suggesting that the effect is mediated through transfer of donor immunity. Our data suggest that donor CMV status influences outcome of unrelated SCT. For a CMV-seropositive patient, a seropositive donor might be preferable.
巨细胞病毒(CMV)一直是异基因造血干细胞移植(SCT)后发病和死亡的主要原因。受者的血清学状态至关重要。然而,供者血清学状态在CMV血清学阳性受者中的重要性存在争议。我们分析了一大群患者中供者CMV状态的影响。纳入了向欧洲血液与骨髓移植组(EBMT)报告的总共7018例CMV血清学阳性患者;5910例患者接受了 HLA 全相合同胞 SCT,1108例患者接受了无关供者 SCT。构建了单因素和多因素比例风险模型以分析生存率、无事件生存率、移植相关死亡率和复发率。接受来自CMV血清学阳性 HLA 全相合同胞供者移植物的患者与接受来自血清学阴性供者移植物的患者生存率相同(风险比[HR],1.04;P = 0.37;95%置信区间[CI],0.95 - 1.14)。然而,接受来自CMV血清学阳性供者移植物的无关供者干细胞(SC)移植受者的5年生存率有所提高(35%对27%;HR = 0.8;P = 0.006),无事件生存率有所提高(30%对22%;HR = 0.8;P = 0.01),移植相关死亡率降低(49%对62%;HR = 0.7;P < 0.001)。对复发率没有影响。供者CMV状态的影响在多因素分析中仍然存在。供者状态的影响在不同疾病类别中有所不同。在慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者中,T细胞去除消除了供者状态的有益影响,表明这种影响是通过供者免疫的转移介导的。我们的数据表明供者CMV状态影响无关SCT的结果。对于CMV血清学阳性患者,血清学阳性供者可能更可取。