Boyce Philip M, Talley Nicholas J, Balaam Belinda, Koloski Natasha A, Truman George
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;98(10):2209-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07716.x.
Psychological treatments are considered to be useful in the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), although the evidence is based on small, often flawed trials. Although cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and relaxation therapy have both been promising, we hypothesized that CBT would be superior to relaxation and standard care alone in IBS patients. The objective of this study was to test this assumption by comparing the effects of cognitive behavior therapy with relaxation therapy and routine clinical care alone in individuals with IBS.
Patients (n = 105) with Rome I criteria for IBS were recruited from advertisement (n = 51) and outpatient clinics (n = 54); those patients with resistant IBS were not included. A randomized controlled trial with three arms (standard care for all groups plus either CBT or relaxation) for 8 wk was conducted, which applied blinded outcome assessments using validated measures with 1 yr of follow-up. The primary outcome for this study was bowel symptom severity.
Of 105 patients at the commencement of treatment, the mean bowel symptom frequency score for the whole sample was 21.1 and at the end of treatment had fallen to 18.1; this persisted at the 52-wk follow-up, with a significant linear trend for scores to change over time (F = 39.57 p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences among the three treatment conditions. Significant changes over time were found for physical functioning (F = 4.37, p < 0.001), pain (F = 3.12, p < 0.05), general health (F = 2.71, p < 0.05), vitality (F = 2.94, p < 0.05), and the social functioning scales on the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (F = 4.08, p < 0.05); however, all three arms showed similar improvement. There were significant reductions in anxiety, depression, and locus of control scales, but no significant differences among the treatment groups were detected.
Cognitive behavior and relaxation therapy seem not to be superior to standard care alone in IBS.
心理治疗被认为对肠易激综合征(IBS)有效,尽管证据基于小型且常常存在缺陷的试验。虽然认知行为疗法(CBT)和放松疗法都颇具前景,但我们假设在IBS患者中,CBT比单纯的放松疗法和标准护理更具优势。本研究的目的是通过比较认知行为疗法与放松疗法及单纯常规临床护理对IBS患者的效果来验证这一假设。
根据罗马I标准招募IBS患者(n = 105),其中51名通过广告招募,54名来自门诊诊所;排除难治性IBS患者。进行了一项为期8周的三臂随机对照试验(所有组均接受标准护理,外加CBT或放松疗法),采用经过验证的测量方法进行盲法结局评估,并进行1年的随访。本研究的主要结局是肠道症状严重程度。
在治疗开始时的105名患者中,整个样本的肠道症状频率平均得分是21.1,治疗结束时降至18.1;在52周随访时仍保持这一水平,得分随时间有显著的线性变化趋势(F = 39.57,p < 0.001)。然而,三种治疗条件之间没有显著差异。发现身体功能(F = 4.37,p < 0.001)、疼痛(F = 3.12,p < 0.05)、总体健康(F = 2.71,p < 0.05)、活力(F = 2.94,p < 0.05)以及医学结局研究简表36中的社会功能量表(F = 4.08,p < 0.05)随时间有显著变化;然而,所有三个治疗组的改善情况相似。焦虑、抑郁和控制点量表有显著降低,但未检测到治疗组之间的显著差异。
在IBS中,认知行为疗法和放松疗法似乎并不比单纯的标准护理更具优势。