Higashi Mitchell K, Veenstra David L, Langley Paul C
Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(2):83-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422020-00002.
Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and actinic keratosis are becoming an increasingly important healthcare problem. There are approximately 1 million cases of NMSC in the US each year, primarily basal cell carcinomas, and the incidence is increasing. Although NMSC is significant in terms of both health risk and the resource implications for treatment within healthcare systems, our understanding of the health economics of NMSC is limited. The purpose of this article was to systematically review and assess published health economic studies of the treatment of NMSC and actinic keratosis, taking into consideration key aspects of guidelines set by drug purchasers and key reimbursement agencies, and to provide recommendations for appropriate modelling approaches and data collection for health economic studies of NMSC and actinic keratosis. We systematically reviewed the published literature from 1965 to 2003 for health economic evaluations of treatments of NMSC and actinic keratosis using the search terms: ('skin cancer' or 'non melanoma skin cancer' or 'basal cell carcinoma' or 'actinic keratosis') and ('decision model' or 'decision theoretic' or 'decision analytic' or 'health economic' or 'cost effective'). Studies using one of the following methodologies were included: cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost-utility, cost-minimisation, cost-of-illness, cost-consequence, and treatment cost analysis. We identified eight studies evaluating NMSC. One of these studies also evaluated actinic keratosis. Although several studies satisfied some of the basic requirements of health economic evaluations, the majority had serious shortcomings that limit their usefulness. There are a few high-quality health economic evaluations assessing treatments for NMSC or actinic keratosis. However, our analysis suggests that additional data on treatment practice patterns and epidemiology need to be collected, and incorporated with efficacy and safety data in a formal decision-analytic framework to assist decision makers in allocating scarce healthcare resources.
非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)和光化性角化病正日益成为一个重要的医疗保健问题。美国每年约有100万例NMSC病例,主要是基底细胞癌,且发病率呈上升趋势。尽管NMSC在健康风险和医疗系统内治疗的资源影响方面都很显著,但我们对NMSC的健康经济学的理解却很有限。本文的目的是系统地回顾和评估已发表的关于NMSC和光化性角化病治疗的健康经济研究,同时考虑药品采购方和主要报销机构制定的指南的关键方面,并为NMSC和光化性角化病的健康经济研究提供适当的建模方法和数据收集建议。我们系统地回顾了1965年至2003年发表的关于NMSC和光化性角化病治疗的健康经济评估文献,使用的检索词为:(“皮肤癌”或“非黑色素瘤皮肤癌”或“基底细胞癌”或“光化性角化病”)和(“决策模型”或“决策理论”或“决策分析”或“健康经济”或“成本效益”)。纳入了使用以下方法之一的研究:成本效益分析、成本效益分析、成本效用分析、成本最小化分析、疾病成本分析、成本后果分析和治疗成本分析。我们确定了八项评估NMSC的研究。其中一项研究还评估了光化性角化病。尽管有几项研究满足了健康经济评估的一些基本要求,但大多数研究存在严重缺陷,限制了其有用性。有一些高质量的健康经济评估评估了NMSC或光化性角化病的治疗方法。然而,我们的分析表明,需要收集更多关于治疗实践模式和流行病学的数据,并将其与疗效和安全性数据纳入一个正式的决策分析框架,以帮助决策者分配稀缺的医疗资源。