Suppr超能文献

前哨淋巴结微转移作为腋窝肿瘤负荷的预测指标。

Sentinel lymph node micrometastasis as a predictor of axillary tumor burden.

作者信息

Dabbs David J, Fung Mark, Landsittel Douglas, McManus Kim, Johnson Ronald

机构信息

Department of Pathology,Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

Breast J. 2004 Mar-Apr;10(2):101-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122x.2004.21280.x.

Abstract

The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure is an alternative method for assessing the axillary lymph node (ALN) status in patients with breast cancer. The SLNB carries the risk of a false-negative result, with patients harboring positive ALNs in the face of a negative SLNB examination. In addition, the significance of a SLNB with cells identified only with keratin or with deposits less than 0.2 mm remains unresolved. We analyzed our SLNB data over the past 5 years in order to determine the relationship between SLN tumor burden and ALN tumor burden. Pathology files for the past 5 years at Magee-Womens Hospital were searched for all SLNB cases that had an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Each SLNB case was reviewed and tabulated for breast tumor size, SLN tumor size, and largest tumor size in the ALND. Correlation and frequency distribution were performed for the status of all SLNs and ALNDs. Patterns of lymph node metastasis were recorded and the sizes of the SLN metastases were reported according to the recent Philadelphia Consensus Conference on Sentinel Lymph Nodes and the revised American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging. SLN metastases were classified as immunohistochemistry (IHC) positive if only single keratin-positive cells or clusters were present and were not observed with standard tissue stains, as submicrometastatic (SMM) if tumors were less than 0.2 mm (excluding IHC positive), as micrometastatic if tumors were larger than 0.2 mm but </=2 mm, or as macrometastatic if tumors were larger than 2 mm. A total of 445 patients had both SLNB and ALND. Fifty percent (224/445) of cases were SLN positive, including 58 SLN positive/ALN positive cases and 166 SLN positive/ALN negative cases. Of the 221 patients in the SLN-negative group, 4 were ALN positive (false-negative SLN). The incidence of SLN metastases increased with tumor stage, with the percentage of SLN positives as follows: T1a, 2.1%; T1b, 10.9%; T1c, 51.7%; and T2, 35.3%. There were 4 of 41 patients (10%) with SLNs that were IHC positive that had macrometastases in a solitary ALN. Three of 22 patients (13.6%) that were SMM positive had ALN macrometastasis in a solitary ALN. Four of 49 patients (8.1%) with micrometastatic SLNs had a solitary positive ALN, 3 of which were macrometastases (6.1%). Overall a total of 10 of 112 patients (9.0%) with traditionally defined SLN micrometastases of 2.0 mm or less had a solitary ALN macrometastasis. The vast majority (90%) of these macrometastases were found with T1c and T2 breast tumors. There was a significant difference in the means of SLN tumor sizes for the SLN-positive/ALND-negative (4.5 mm) versus SLN-positive/ALND-positive (10.1 mm) patients, although the range of SLN tumor sizes within each group were similar. There is an increasing incidence of SLN-positive and ALN-positive cases with increasing T stage. Overall in this series, 9% of patients with SLN metastases </=2 mm had a solitary axillary macrometastasis. Ninety percent of these metastases occurred with T1c/T2 breast tumors, indicating the important codependence of T stage. Overall there is a subset of patients who are IHC positive, SMM positive, or micrometastatic positive with ALNs that are macrometastatic who are at risk of harboring axillary macrometastases. Keratin IHC of breast SLNs is useful for defining these subsets.

摘要

前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是评估乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结(ALN)状态的一种替代方法。SLNB存在假阴性结果的风险,即SLNB检查为阴性但患者的ALN为阳性。此外,仅通过角蛋白鉴定或沉积物小于0.2mm的SLNB的意义仍未明确。我们分析了过去5年的SLNB数据,以确定前哨淋巴结肿瘤负荷与腋窝淋巴结肿瘤负荷之间的关系。在梅杰妇女医院过去5年的病理档案中,搜索了所有进行腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)的SLNB病例。对每个SLNB病例进行复查,并列出乳腺肿瘤大小、前哨淋巴结肿瘤大小和ALND中最大肿瘤大小。对所有前哨淋巴结和腋窝淋巴结清扫术的状态进行相关性和频率分布分析。根据最近关于前哨淋巴结的费城共识会议和修订后的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期,记录淋巴结转移模式并报告前哨淋巴结转移灶的大小。如果仅存在单个角蛋白阳性细胞或细胞簇且在标准组织染色中未观察到,则前哨淋巴结转移灶被分类为免疫组化(IHC)阳性;如果肿瘤小于0.2mm(不包括IHC阳性),则为亚微转移(SMM);如果肿瘤大于0.2mm但≤2mm,则为微转移;如果肿瘤大于2mm,则为宏转移。共有445例患者同时进行了SLNB和ALND。50%(224/445)的病例前哨淋巴结为阳性,包括58例前哨淋巴结阳性/腋窝淋巴结阳性病例和166例前哨淋巴结阳性/腋窝淋巴结阴性病例。在前哨淋巴结阴性组的221例患者中,4例腋窝淋巴结为阳性(前哨淋巴结假阴性)。前哨淋巴结转移的发生率随肿瘤分期增加,前哨淋巴结阳性的百分比分别为:T1a期,2.1%;T1b期,10.9%;T1c期,51.7%;T2期,35.3%。41例患者中有4例(10%)前哨淋巴结IHC阳性,在单个腋窝淋巴结中有宏转移。22例SMM阳性患者中有3例(13.6%)在单个腋窝淋巴结中有ALN宏转移。49例微转移前哨淋巴结患者中有4例(8.1%)有单个阳性腋窝淋巴结,其中3例为宏转移(6.1%)。总体而言,112例传统定义的前哨淋巴结微转移≤2.0mm的患者中有10例(9.0%)有单个腋窝淋巴结宏转移。这些宏转移中的绝大多数(90%)在T1c期和T2期乳腺肿瘤中发现。前哨淋巴结阳性/腋窝淋巴结清扫术阴性(4.5mm)与前哨淋巴结阳性/腋窝淋巴结清扫术阳性(10.1mm)患者的前哨淋巴结肿瘤大小平均值存在显著差异,尽管每组内前哨淋巴结肿瘤大小范围相似。随着T分期增加,前哨淋巴结阳性和腋窝淋巴结阳性病例的发生率增加。总体而言,在本系列中,9%的前哨淋巴结转移≤2mm的患者有单个腋窝宏转移。这些转移中的90%发生在T1c/T2期乳腺肿瘤中,表明T分期的重要相互依存关系。总体而言,有一部分患者前哨淋巴结IHC阳性、SMM阳性或微转移阳性,腋窝淋巴结为宏转移,存在腋窝宏转移的风险。乳腺前哨淋巴结的角蛋白IHC有助于定义这些亚组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验