Kerse Ngaire, Butler Meg, Robinson Elizabeth, Todd Maree
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):524-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52157.x.
To establish the effectiveness of a fall-prevention program in reducing falls and injurious falls in older residential care residents.
Cluster, randomized, controlled trial.
Fourteen randomly selected residential care homes in Auckland, New Zealand.
All older residents (n=628, 95% participation rate).
Residential care staff, using existing resources, implemented systematic individualized fall-risk management for all residents using a fall-risk assessment tool, high-risk logo, and strategies to address identified risks.
Number of residents sustaining a fall, falls, and injurious-falls incidence rates.
During 12 months of follow-up, 103 (43%) residents in the control group and 173 (56%) residents in the intervention group fell (P<.018). There was a significantly higher incidence rate of falls in intervention homes than in control homes (incident rate ratio=1.34, 95% confidence interval=1.06-1.72) during the intervention period after adjusting for dependency level (type of home), baseline fall rate, and clustering. There was no difference in the injurious fall incidence rate or incidence of serious injuries.
This fall-prevention intervention did not reduce falls or injury from falls. Low-intensity intervention may be worse than usual care.
确定一项预防跌倒计划在减少老年寄宿护理居民跌倒及跌倒致伤方面的有效性。
整群随机对照试验。
新西兰奥克兰随机选取的14家寄宿护理院。
所有老年居民(n = 628,参与率95%)。
寄宿护理工作人员利用现有资源,使用跌倒风险评估工具、高风险标识以及针对已识别风险的应对策略,对所有居民实施系统的个体化跌倒风险管理。
跌倒居民数量、跌倒次数以及跌倒致伤发生率。
在12个月的随访期间,对照组有103名(43%)居民跌倒,干预组有173名(56%)居民跌倒(P <.018)。在调整了依赖程度(护理院类型)、基线跌倒率和聚类因素后,干预期间干预护理院的跌倒发生率显著高于对照护理院(发生率比 = 1.34,95%置信区间 = 1.06 - 1.72)。跌倒致伤发生率或重伤发生率无差异。
这项预防跌倒干预措施并未减少跌倒或跌倒所致伤害。低强度干预可能比常规护理更差。