Steinsaltz David, Evans Steven N
Department of Demography, University of California, 2232 Piedmont Ave., Berkeley, CA 94720-2120, USA.
Theor Popul Biol. 2004 Jun;65(4):319-37. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2003.10.007.
This paper explains some implications of Markov-process theory for models of mortality. We show that an important qualitative feature common to empirical mortality data, and which has been found in certain models-the convergence to a "mortality plateau"-is, in fact, a generic consequence of the models' convergence to a "quasistationary distribution". This phenomenon has been explored extensively in the mathematical literature. Not only does this generalization free important results from specifics of the models, it also suggests a new explanation for the convergence to constant mortality. At the same time that we show that the late behavior of these models-convergence to a finite asymptote-is almost logically immutable, we also point out that the early behavior of the mortality rates can be more flexible than has been generally acknowledged. We show, in particular, that an appropriate choice of initial conditions enables one popular model to approximate any reasonable hazard-rate data. This illustrates how precarious it can be to read a model's vindication from its consilience with a favored hazard-rate function, such as the Gompertz exponential.
本文解释了马尔可夫过程理论对死亡率模型的一些影响。我们表明,经验死亡率数据中常见的一个重要定性特征,即在某些模型中发现的——收敛到“死亡率平稳期”——实际上是模型收敛到“拟平稳分布”的一个普遍结果。这种现象在数学文献中已得到广泛探讨。这种概括不仅使重要结果摆脱了模型的具体细节,还为收敛到恒定死亡率提出了一种新的解释。与此同时,我们表明这些模型的后期行为——收敛到有限渐近线——在逻辑上几乎是不变的,我们还指出死亡率的早期行为可能比一般认为的更灵活。特别是,我们表明适当选择初始条件能使一个流行模型近似任何合理的风险率数据。这说明了从模型与诸如冈珀茨指数等偏好的风险率函数的一致性来解读模型的合理性是多么不稳定。