Slater R A, Lazarovitch T, Boldur I, Ramot Y, Buchs A, Weiss M, Hindi A, Rapoport M J
Diabetes Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin 70300, Israel.
Diabet Med. 2004 Jul;21(7):705-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01221.x.
Current clinical practice assumes swab cultures from wounds are unreliable. However, this assumption is based upon data culled only from wounds in which osteomyelitis and/or gangrene were present. This study aimed to re-evaluate the accuracy of swab cultures vs. deep tissue cultures in diabetic wounds of varying depth and severity.
A total of 60 infected diabetic foot wounds were cultured. Two specimens were taken from each wound: superficial swab before debridement and deep tissue specimen towards the end of surgical debridement.
In 37 wounds (62%), the micro-organisms isolated from the swab specimen and those isolated from the deep tissue specimen were identical. In another 12 wounds (20%), the swab culture contained all micro-organisms isolated from the deep tissue culture, but also contained additional micro-organisms. Analysis according to the depth of the wound, demonstrated that swabs identified all micro-organisms isolated from the deep tissue specimens in 36/40 wounds (90%) that did not extend to bone as opposed to 13/20 wounds (65%) that extended to bone.
Swab cultures are valuable in identifying pathogens in diabetic foot wounds when bone is not involved. When surgical debridement is contraindicated or delayed, swab cultures can be used to select appropriate antibiotic therapy.
目前的临床实践认为伤口拭子培养结果不可靠。然而,这一假设仅基于从存在骨髓炎和/或坏疽的伤口中收集的数据。本研究旨在重新评估拭子培养与不同深度和严重程度的糖尿病伤口深部组织培养的准确性。
共对60例感染的糖尿病足伤口进行培养。每个伤口采集两个样本:清创术前的浅表拭子和手术清创接近尾声时的深部组织样本。
在37个伤口(62%)中,从拭子样本中分离出的微生物与从深部组织样本中分离出的微生物相同。在另外12个伤口(20%)中,拭子培养包含了从深部组织培养中分离出的所有微生物,但也包含其他微生物。根据伤口深度分析表明,在36/40个(90%)未累及骨骼的伤口中,拭子鉴定出了从深部组织样本中分离出的所有微生物,而在13/20个(65%)累及骨骼的伤口中则不然。
当不涉及骨骼时,拭子培养对于鉴定糖尿病足伤口中的病原体很有价值。当手术清创禁忌或延迟时,拭子培养可用于选择合适的抗生素治疗。