Glauser Roland, Sennerby Lars, Meredith Neil, Rée Andreas, Lundgren AnnaKarin, Gottlow Jan, Hämmerle Christoph H F
Department for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):428-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01036.x.
The objective of this study was to analyze the development of implant stability by repeated resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements during 1 year in 23 patients treated according to an immediate/early-loading protocol. The objective was also to evaluate the possible differences between failing and successful implants.
Eighty-one Brånemark System implants were placed in 23 patients for immediate/early-occlusal loading in all jaw regions. Thirty of the implants were placed in extraction sockets and 62 were subjected to GBR procedures. Apart from clinical and radiographic examinations, the patients were followed with RFA at placement, prosthesis connection and after 1-3, 6 and 12 months. Statistical analyses were carried out to study the possible differences between implants that failed during the study period and implants that remained successful.
Nine implants failed (11.2%) during the 1 year of loading. RFA showed a distinct different pattern between the implants that remained stable and the implants that were lost. The implants that failed during the course of the study showed a significantly lower stability already after 1 month.
Within the limitations of this study, it is concluded that failing implants show a continuous decrease of stability until failure. Low RFA levels after 1 and 2 months seem to indicate an increased risk for future failure. This information may be used to avoid implant failure in the future by unloading implants with decreasing degree of stability with time as diagnosed with the RFA technique.
本研究的目的是分析23例按照即刻/早期负载方案治疗的患者在1年期间通过重复共振频率分析(RFA)测量种植体稳定性的发展情况。目的还包括评估失败种植体和成功种植体之间可能存在的差异。
在23例患者的所有颌骨区域植入81枚Brånemark系统种植体以进行即刻/早期咬合负载。其中30枚种植体植入拔牙窝,62枚进行引导骨再生(GBR)手术。除临床和影像学检查外,在种植体植入时、修复体连接时以及术后1 - 3个月、6个月和12个月对患者进行RFA随访。进行统计分析以研究在研究期间失败的种植体与仍成功的种植体之间可能存在的差异。
在1年的负载期内,9枚种植体失败(11.2%)。RFA显示稳定的种植体和失败的种植体之间存在明显不同的模式。在研究过程中失败的种植体在1个月后就显示出明显较低的稳定性。
在本研究的局限性范围内,得出结论:失败的种植体在失败前稳定性持续下降。术后1个月和2个月时较低的RFA水平似乎表明未来失败风险增加。该信息可用于未来通过使用RFA技术诊断随着时间推移稳定性降低的种植体并减轻其负载来避免种植体失败。