de Cueto Marina, Ceballos Esther, Martinez-Martinez Luis, Perea Evelio J, Pascual Alvaro
Microbiology Department, Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Aug;42(8):3734-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3734-3738.2004.
In order to further decrease the time lapse between initial inoculation of blood culture media and the reporting of results of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests for microorganisms causing bacteremia, we performed a prospective study in which specially processed fluid from positive blood culture bottles from Bactec 9240 (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) containing aerobic media were directly inoculated into Vitek 2 system cards (bio-Mérieux, France). Organism identification and susceptibility results were compared with those obtained from cards inoculated with a standardized bacterial suspension obtained following subculture to agar; 100 consecutive positive monomicrobic blood cultures, consisting of 50 gram-negative rods and 50 gram-positive cocci, were included in the study. For gram-negative organisms, 31 of the 50 (62%) showed complete agreement with the standard method for species identification, while none of the 50 gram-positive cocci were correctly identified by the direct method. For gram-negative rods, there were 50% categorical agreements between the direct and standard methods for all drugs tested. The very major error rate was 2.4%, and the major error rate was 0.6%. The overall error rate for gram-negatives was 6.6%. Complete agreement in clinical categories of all antimicrobial agents evaluated was obtained for 19 of 50 (38%) gram-positive cocci evaluated; the overall error rate was 8.4%, with 2.8% minor errors, 2.4% major errors, and 3.2% very major errors. These findings suggest that the Vitek 2 cards inoculated directly from positive Bactec 9240 bottles do not provide acceptable bacterial identification or susceptibility testing in comparison with corresponding cards tested by a standard method.
为了进一步缩短从初次接种血培养培养基到报告引起菌血症的微生物鉴定及药敏试验结果之间的时间间隔,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,将来自含有需氧培养基的Bactec 9240(美国马里兰州科基斯维尔市BD公司)血培养阳性瓶的经过特殊处理的液体直接接种到Vitek 2系统卡片(法国生物梅里埃公司)中。将微生物鉴定和药敏结果与接种经琼脂传代培养后获得的标准化细菌悬液的卡片所得到的结果进行比较;该研究纳入了100例连续的阳性单微生物血培养,其中包括50株革兰阴性杆菌和50株革兰阳性球菌。对于革兰阴性菌,50株中有31株(62%)在菌种鉴定方面与标准方法完全一致,而50株革兰阳性球菌中没有一株通过直接法被正确鉴定。对于革兰阴性杆菌,直接法与标准法在所有测试药物方面的分类一致率为50%。极重大错误率为2.4%,重大错误率为0.6%。革兰阴性菌的总体错误率为6.6%。在评估的50株革兰阳性球菌中,有19株(38%)在所有评估抗菌药物的临床分类上完全一致;总体错误率为8.4%,其中轻微错误率为2.8%,重大错误率为2.4%,极重大错误率为3.2%。这些结果表明,与通过标准方法测试的相应卡片相比,直接从Bactec 9240阳性瓶接种的Vitek 2卡片不能提供可接受的细菌鉴定或药敏试验结果。