Suppr超能文献

利多卡因注射、肉毒杆菌毒素注射与肌筋膜疼痛综合征触发点干针疗法的比较。

Comparison of lidocaine injection, botulinum toxin injection, and dry needling to trigger points in myofascial pain syndrome.

作者信息

Kamanli A, Kaya A, Ardicoglu O, Ozgocmen S, Zengin F Ozkurt, Bayik Y

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2005 Oct;25(8):604-11. doi: 10.1007/s00296-004-0485-6. Epub 2004 Sep 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common causes of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Several methods have been recommended for the inactivation of trigger points (TrP).

OBJECTIVES

This prospective, single-blind study was proposed to compare TrP injection with botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) to dry needling and lidocaine injection in MPS.

METHODS

Eighty-seven trigger points (cervical and/or periscapular regions) in 23 female and six male patients with MPS were treated and randomly assigned to three groups: lidocaine injection (n=10, 32 TrP), dry needling (n=10, 33 TrP), and BTX-A injection (n=9, 22 TrP).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical assessment including cervical range of motion, TrP pain pressure threshold (PPT), pain scores (PS), and visual analog scales for pain, fatigue, and work disability were evaluated at entry and the end of the 4th week. Additionally, depression and anxiety were evaluated with the Hamilton depression and anxiety rating scales, and quality of life was assessed using the Nottingham health profile (NHP). The subjects were also asked to describe side effects. INJECTION PROCEDURE: One milliliter of 0.5% lidocaine was administered to each TrP in the lidocaine injection group, 10-20 IU of BTX-A to each TrP in the BTX-A group, and dry needling to each TrP in the last group, followed by stretching of the muscle groups involved. The patients were instructed to continue their home exercise programs.

RESULTS

Pain pressure thresholds and PS significantly improved in all three groups. In the lidocaine group, PPT values were significantly higher than in the dry needle group, and PS were significantly lower than in both the BTX-A and dry needle groups. In all, visual analog scores significantly decreased in the lidocaine injection and BTX-A groups and did not significantly change in the dry needle group. Disturbance during the injection procedure was lowest in the lidocaine injection group. Quality of life scores assessed by NHP significantly improved in the lidocaine and BTX-A groups but not in the dry needle group. Depression and anxiety scores significantly improved only in the BTX-A-injected group.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection is more practical and rapid, since it causes less disturbance than dry needling and is more cost effective than BTX-A injection, and seems the treatment of choice in MPS. On the other hand, BTX-A could be selectively used in MPS patients resistant to conventional treatments.

摘要

背景

肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛最常见的病因之一。已推荐了几种用于触发点(TrP)失活的方法。

目的

本前瞻性单盲研究旨在比较肉毒杆菌毒素A(BTX-A)注射TrP与干针穿刺及利多卡因注射治疗MPS的效果。

方法

对23例女性和6例男性MPS患者的87个触发点(颈部和/或肩胛周围区域)进行治疗,并随机分为三组:利多卡因注射组(n = 10,32个TrP)、干针穿刺组(n = 10,33个TrP)和BTX-A注射组(n = 9,22个TrP)。

观察指标

在入组时和第4周结束时评估临床指标,包括颈部活动范围、TrP疼痛压力阈值(PPT)、疼痛评分(PS)以及疼痛、疲劳和工作能力丧失的视觉模拟量表。此外,用汉密尔顿抑郁和焦虑评定量表评估抑郁和焦虑情况,用诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)评估生活质量。还询问受试者有关副作用的情况。

注射方法

利多卡因注射组每个TrP注射1毫升0.5%利多卡因,BTX-A组每个TrP注射10 - 20国际单位BTX-A,最后一组对每个TrP进行干针穿刺,随后对受累肌肉群进行拉伸。指导患者继续其家庭锻炼计划。

结果

三组的疼痛压力阈值和PS均显著改善。在利多卡因组,PPT值显著高于干针组,PS显著低于BTX-A组和干针组。总体而言,利多卡因注射组和BTX-A组的视觉模拟评分显著降低,干针组无显著变化。注射过程中的不适感在利多卡因注射组最低。NHP评估的生活质量评分在利多卡因组和BTX-A组显著改善,干针组未改善。抑郁和焦虑评分仅在BTX-A注射组显著改善。

结论

注射更实用、快速,因为它比干针穿刺引起的干扰更少,且比BTX-A注射更具成本效益,似乎是MPS的首选治疗方法。另一方面,BTX-A可选择性用于对传统治疗耐药的MPS患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验