Moisidis Elias, Heath Tim, Boorer Catherine, Ho Kevin, Deva Anand K
Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Sep 15;114(4):917-22. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000133168.57199.e1.
Topical negative pressure has been demonstrated to improve graft take in a number of noncomparative studies. This study aimed to assess whether split-thickness skin graft take is improved qualitatively or quantitatively with topical negative pressure therapy compared with standard bolster dressings. A blinded, prospective, randomized trial was conducted of 22 adult inpatients of Liverpool Hospital between July of 2001 and July of 2002 who had wounds requiring skin grafting. After grafting, each wound half was randomized to receive either a standard bolster dressing or a topical negative pressure dressing. Skin graft assessment was performed at 2 weeks by a single observer blinded to the randomization. Two patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. There were 20 patients (12 men and eightwomen) in the study group. The median patient age was 64 years (range, 27 to 88 years), and the mean wound size was 128 cm2 (range, 35 to 450 cm2). The wound exposed subcutaneous fat in eight patients, muscle in six patients, paratenon in four patients, and deep fascia in two patients. At 2 weeks, wounds that received a topical negative pressure dressing had a greater degree of epithelialization in six cases (30 percent), the same degree of epithelialization in nine cases (45 percent), and less epithelialization in five cases (25 percent) compared with their respective control wounds. Graft quality following topical negative pressure therapy was subjectively determined to be better in 10 cases (50 percent), equivalent in seven cases (35 percent), and worse in three cases (15 percent). Although the quantitative graft take was not significant, the qualitative graft take was found to be significantly better with the use of topical negative pressure therapy (p < 0.05). Topical negative pressure significantly improved the qualitative appearance of split-thickness skin grafts as compared with standard bolster dressings.
在一些非对照研究中,已证实局部负压可提高移植皮片的成活率。本研究旨在评估与标准加压包扎相比,局部负压疗法是否能在质量或数量上提高中厚皮片的成活率。2001年7月至2002年7月期间,对利物浦医院22名需要植皮的成年住院患者进行了一项双盲、前瞻性、随机试验。植皮后,将每个伤口的一半随机分配接受标准加压包扎或局部负压包扎。由一名对随机分组不知情的观察者在2周时进行皮片评估。两名患者失访,被排除在研究之外。研究组有20名患者(12名男性和8名女性)。患者年龄中位数为64岁(范围27至88岁),平均伤口面积为128平方厘米(范围35至450平方厘米)。8名患者的伤口暴露皮下脂肪,6名患者暴露肌肉,4名患者暴露腱旁组织,2名患者暴露深筋膜。2周时,与各自的对照伤口相比,接受局部负压包扎的伤口有6例(30%)上皮化程度更高,9例(45%)上皮化程度相同,5例(25%)上皮化程度更低。主观判断局部负压治疗后的移植皮片质量在10例(50%)中更好,7例(35%)中相当,3例(15%)中更差。尽管移植皮片的数量成活率无显著差异,但发现使用局部负压疗法时,移植皮片的质量成活率显著更好(p<0.05)。与标准加压包扎相比,局部负压显著改善了中厚皮片的外观质量。