Suppr超能文献

美国胸科学会及其他使用用力肺活量(FVC)和6秒用力呼气容积预测肺总量降低的肺量计算法的有效性。

Validity of the American Thoracic Society and other spirometric algorithms using FVC and forced expiratory volume at 6 s for predicting a reduced total lung capacity.

作者信息

Swanney Maureen P, Beckert Lutz E, Frampton Chris M, Wallace Lauren A, Jensen Robert L, Crapo Robert O

机构信息

Respiratory Physiology Laboratory, Fourth Floor, Riverside Building, Christchurch Hospital, Private Bag 4170, Christchurch 8001, New Zealand.

出版信息

Chest. 2004 Dec;126(6):1861-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.6.1861.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To compare the performance of three spirometric algorithms developed to predict whether the total lung capacity (TLC) is reduced vs normal or increased, (2) to determine if forced expiratory volume at 6 s (FEV(6)) can be substituted for FVC in these algorithms, and (3) to determine if ascertainment bias was present in patients referred for the measurement of spirometry and TLC compared to patients referred for spirometry only.

METHODS

We analyzed the results of 219 consenting consecutive patients referred to a New Zealand tertiary hospital respiratory laboratory for spirometry and TLC measurements. Spirometry results from 370 patients referred for spirometry but not lung volumes were used to test for potential ascertainment bias. Spirometry results were analyzed using the lower limit of normal (LLN) values from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Study reference equations. The equations of Goldman and Becklake, and Crapo were used to classify TLC as normal or abnormal. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to produce an algorithm using the LLN for FVC and FEV(6). The performances of previous algorithms and our own algorithms were analyzed for predicting a reduced lung volume against the "gold standard," plethysmographic TLC.

RESULTS

All three algorithms predicted a reduced TLC with an accuracy of approximately 50%. In contrast, all algorithms predicted TLC was either normal or increased with an accuracy of > or = 99% regardless of the reference set used. The algorithms based on FEV(6) performed equally as well as the FVC algorithms. No ascertainment bias was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that spirometry-based algorithms can accurately predict when TLC is either normal or increased, and can also increase the a priori probability that TLC is reduced to approximately 50%. FEV(6) is equivalent to FVC in these predictions.

摘要

目的

(1)比较三种用于预测肺总量(TLC)是降低、正常还是增加的肺量计算法的性能;(2)确定在这些算法中,6秒用力呼气容积(FEV(6))是否可替代用力肺活量(FVC);(3)确定与仅被转诊进行肺量计检查的患者相比,被转诊进行肺量计和TLC测量的患者中是否存在确诊偏倚。

方法

我们分析了219名连续同意的患者的结果,这些患者被转诊至新西兰一家三级医院的呼吸实验室进行肺量计和TLC测量。370名仅被转诊进行肺量计检查而非肺容积检查的患者的肺量计结果用于检测潜在的确诊偏倚。使用第三次国家健康和营养检查研究参考方程的正常下限(LLN)值分析肺量计结果。使用戈德曼和贝克莱克以及克拉波的方程将TLC分类为正常或异常。使用受试者操作特征曲线,利用FVC和FEV(6)的LLN生成一种算法。分析先前算法和我们自己算法在根据“金标准”体积描记法TLC预测肺容积降低方面的性能。

结果

所有三种算法预测TLC降低的准确率约为50%。相比之下,无论使用何种参考集,所有算法预测TLC正常或增加的准确率均≥99%。基于FEV(6)的算法与基于FVC的算法表现相当。未发现确诊偏倚。

结论

本研究提供的证据表明,基于肺量计的算法能够准确预测TLC何时正常或增加,还能将TLC降低的先验概率提高到约50%。在这些预测中,FEV(6)等同于FVC。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验