Johansson Eva E
Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin, enheten för allmänmedicin, Umeå universitet, Sweden.
Lakartidningen. 2004 Nov 18;101(47):3774, 3776, 3778-9.
Gender perspective aims at shedding light on how the body as well as the social circumstances that men and women live in contribute to different expressions of pain. This database research reveals that sex differences are described, but gender perspective is missing in the medical understanding of pain. Experimental studies are small and have little power. Still, generalisations about men and women--their different biology and personality--are made. Therefore aspects of bias in experimentally-demonstrated sex differences must be discussed: VAS measurements are certainly influenced by gender. Occurrence of sex differences is overestimated by publication bias and research strategies. For instance, "gender" is linked to sex genotype, thus differentiation. Biological and psychosocial explanations of different expressions of pain risk being gender blind unless understood in a gender context. Scrutinising research can make us aware of our own contribution to gendered pain constructions--in our approach to science and to patients in encounters.
性别视角旨在阐明身体以及男性和女性所处的社会环境如何导致疼痛的不同表现。这项数据库研究表明,虽然描述了性别差异,但在对疼痛的医学理解中却缺失了性别视角。实验研究规模较小且效力有限。然而,人们仍对男性和女性——他们不同的生物学特征和性格——进行了概括。因此,必须讨论实验证明的性别差异中的偏差问题:视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量肯定会受到性别的影响。发表偏倚和研究策略高估了性别差异的发生率。例如,“性别”与性基因型相关联,从而造成了混淆。除非在性别背景下理解,否则对疼痛不同表现的生物学和社会心理解释可能会忽视性别因素。仔细审查研究可以让我们意识到自己在构建性别化疼痛方面所起的作用——在我们从事科学研究以及与患者接触的过程中。