Standl Eberhard, Lang Hanne, Roberts Anthony
Diabetes Research Institute, Munich, Germany.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004 Oct;6(5):579-88. doi: 10.1089/dia.2004.6.579.
This trial compared the long-term safety and efficacy of the basal insulin preparations, insulin detemir and NPH insulin, in basal-bolus therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes.
This multinational open, parallel-group trial randomized patients to receive insulin detemir or NPH insulin twice daily in addition to mealtime human soluble insulin. Doses were titrated towards predefined glycemic targets. After an initial 6-month treatment period, patients were invited to participate in a 6-month extension period. A total of 289 from 421 elected to continue in the trial, of which 252 completed.
Glycemic control as assessed by hemoglobin A1c (insulin detemir, 7.88%; NPH insulin, 7.78%; difference not significant) and fasting plasma glucose (insulin detemir, 10.1 mmol/L; NPH insulin, 9.84 mmol/L; difference not significant) was similar in both treatment groups at end point, with hemoglobin A1c little changed from baseline and fasting plasma glucose slightly decreased. There was some evidence for a risk reduction for hypoglycemia in association with insulin detemir, although this was not statistically significant (relative risk overall hypoglycemia, 0.71, P = 0.139; relative risk nocturnal hypoglycemia, 0.71, P = 0.067), and hypoglycemic events were fewer in each of the 12 months. There was a significant treatment difference with regard to weight outcome; NPH insulin was associated with weight gain (1.4 kg), but there was no mean weight gain (-0.3 kg) in the insulin detemir cohort (baseline-adjusted between-group difference at 12 months, 1.66 kg, P = 0.002). There were no obvious between-group differences in other safety parameters.
Glycemic control is maintained with insulin detemir during long-term treatment. At equivalent glycemic control to NPH insulin, insulin detemir is associated with a lack of weight gain and a trend towards a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia when used in basal-bolus therapy with mealtime soluble human insulin.
本试验比较了基础胰岛素制剂地特胰岛素和中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH胰岛素)在1型糖尿病患者基础-餐时胰岛素治疗中的长期安全性和有效性。
这项跨国开放性平行组试验将患者随机分为两组,除餐时使用人可溶性胰岛素外,一组每日两次接受地特胰岛素治疗,另一组每日两次接受NPH胰岛素治疗。剂量根据预定的血糖目标进行滴定。在最初6个月的治疗期后,邀请患者参加为期6个月的延长期。421名患者中有289名选择继续参与试验,其中252名完成试验。
在试验终点,通过糖化血红蛋白评估的血糖控制情况(地特胰岛素组为7.88%;NPH胰岛素组为7.78%;差异无统计学意义)以及空腹血糖(地特胰岛素组为10.1 mmol/L;NPH胰岛素组为9.84 mmol/L;差异无统计学意义)在两组中相似,糖化血红蛋白与基线相比变化不大,空腹血糖略有下降。有证据表明地特胰岛素与低血糖风险降低相关,尽管这在统计学上不显著(总体低血糖相对风险为0.71,P = 0.139;夜间低血糖相对风险为0.71,P = 0.067),且在12个月中的每个月低血糖事件均较少。在体重结果方面存在显著的治疗差异;NPH胰岛素与体重增加(1.4 kg)相关,但地特胰岛素组没有平均体重增加(-0.3 kg)(12个月时基线调整后的组间差异为1.66 kg,P = 0.002)。在其他安全参数方面,两组之间没有明显差异。
长期治疗期间,地特胰岛素可维持血糖控制。在与NPH胰岛素达到等效血糖控制的情况下,地特胰岛素与餐时使用可溶性人胰岛素进行基础-餐时胰岛素治疗时体重不增加以及夜间低血糖风险降低的趋势相关。