Kukko M, Kimpimäki T, Korhonen S, Kupila A, Simell S, Veijola R, Simell T, Ilonen J, Simell O, Knip M
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Center for the Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes in Finland and Medical School, University of Tampere, and Department of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 May;90(5):2712-7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1371. Epub 2005 Feb 15.
This study characterized the dynamics of islet cell antibodies (ICA), insulin antibodies (IAA), glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), and IA-2 antibodies (IA-2A) in 1006 children recruited from the general population due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQB1-conferred risk for type 1 diabetes (T1D). By the age of 5 yr, 13.8% of the children had had one or more autoantibodies in at least one sample drawn at 3- to 12-month intervals from birth, whereas 6.1% had had one or more of the three autoantibodies to biochemically defined antigens in at least two consecutive samples. The cumulative frequencies of positivity for at least two antibodies ranged from 3.2-4.4%. Seventy-five children (7.5%) had at least once ICA, 83 (8.3%) had IAA, 46 (4.6%) had GADA, and 33 (3.3%) had IA-2A. IAA were transient more frequently than the other antibodies (P < or = 0.03) and fluctuated between positivity and negativity more often than ICA (P = 0.001). The genetically high risk children were positive for each autoantibody reactivity more often (P < or = 0.03) than the moderate risk subjects. Thirteen of the 1006 children (1.3%) presented with T1D by the age of 5 yr. The most sensitive predictors of T1D were ICA and IAA, whereas the most specific predictor was IA-2A. Positivity for at least two autoantibodies of IAA, GADA, and IA-2A had the highest positive predictive value for T1D (34%). We conclude that the frequency of various diabetes-associated autoantibodies increases at a relatively stable rate at least up to the age of 5 yr. Persistent positivity for two or more autoantibodies appears to reflect destructive progressive beta-cell autoimmunity, whereas positivity for a single autoantibody may represent harmless nonprogressive or even regressive beta-cell autoimmunity.
本研究对1006名因人类白细胞抗原(HLA)DQB1基因赋予1型糖尿病(T1D)发病风险而从普通人群中招募的儿童,进行了胰岛细胞抗体(ICA)、胰岛素抗体(IAA)、谷氨酸脱羧酶抗体(GADA)和IA-2抗体(IA-2A)动态变化的特征分析。到5岁时,13.8%的儿童在出生后每隔3至12个月采集的至少一份样本中出现过一种或多种自身抗体,而6.1%的儿童在至少两份连续样本中出现过针对生化定义抗原的三种自身抗体中的一种或多种。至少两种抗体呈阳性的累积频率在3.2%至4.4%之间。75名儿童(7.5%)至少有一次ICA呈阳性,83名(8.3%)IAA呈阳性,46名(4.6%)GADA呈阳性,33名(3.3%)IA-2A呈阳性。IAA比其他抗体更频繁地呈短暂阳性(P≤0.03),且在阳性和阴性之间波动的频率比ICA更高(P = 0.001)。遗传高风险儿童每种自身抗体反应性呈阳性的频率比中度风险受试者更高(P≤0.03)。1006名儿童中有13名(1.3%)在5岁时患了T1D。T1D最敏感的预测指标是ICA和IAA,而最具特异性的预测指标是IA-2A。IAA、GADA和IA-2A中至少两种自身抗体呈阳性对T1D的阳性预测值最高(34%)。我们得出结论,至少到5岁时,各种与糖尿病相关的自身抗体频率以相对稳定的速率增加。两种或更多种自身抗体持续呈阳性似乎反映了进行性的胰岛β细胞自身免疫破坏,而单一自身抗体呈阳性可能代表无害的非进行性甚至是退行性的胰岛β细胞自身免疫。