Saarto T, Wiffen P J
Cancer Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, P O Box 180, Helsinki, Finland, FIN-00029.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20(3):CD005454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005454.
For many years antidepressant drugs have been used to manage neuropathic pain, and are often the first choice treatment. It is not clear, however, which antidepressant is more effective, what role the newer antidepressants can play in treating neuropathic pain, and what adverse effects are experienced by patients.
To determine the analgesic effectiveness and safety of antidepressant drugs in neuropathic pain. Migraine and headache studies were not considered.
Randomised trials of antidepressants in neuropathic pain were identified in MEDLINE (1966 to Dec 2003); EMBASE (1980 to Dec 2003); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library 2004, Issue 1; and the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Trials Register (May 2002). Additional reports were identified from the reference list of the retrieved papers, and by contacting investigators.
Randomised trials reporting the analgesic effects of antidepressant drugs in adult patients, with subjective assessment of pain of neuropathic origin. Studies that included patients with chronic headache and migraine were excluded.
Two reviewers agreed the included studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality independently. Fifty trials of 19 antidepressants were considered eligible (2515 patients) for inclusion. Relative Risk (RR) estimates and Number-Needed-to-Treat (NNTs) were calculated from dichotomous data for effectiveness and adverse effects.
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are effective treatments for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Amitriptyline has an NNT of 2 (95%CI 1.7 to 2.5) RR 4.1(95%CI 2.9-5.9) for the achievement of at least moderate pain relief. There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of the newer selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant drugs (SSRIs). There were insufficient data for an assessment of evidence of effectiveness for other antidepressants such as St Johns Wort, venlafaxine and L-tryptophan. For diabetic neuropathy the NNT for effectiveness was 1.3 (95%CI 1.2 to 1.5) RR 12.4(95%CI 5.2-29.2) (five studies); for postherpetic neuralgia 2.2 (95%CI 1.7 to 3.1), RR 4.8(95%CI 2.5-9.5)(three studies). There was evidence that TCAs are not effective in HIV-related neuropathies. The number needed to harm(NNH) for major adverse effects defined as an event leading to withdrawal from a study was 16 (95%CI: 10-45). The NNH for minor adverse effects was 4.6 (95%CI 3.3-6.7)
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressants are effective for a variety of neuropathic pains. The best evidence available is for amitriptyline. There are only limited data for the effectiveness of SSRIs. It is not possible to identify the most effective antidepressant until more studies of SSRIs are conducted.
多年来,抗抑郁药物一直用于治疗神经性疼痛,且常常是首选治疗方法。然而,尚不清楚哪种抗抑郁药效果更佳,新型抗抑郁药在治疗神经性疼痛中能发挥何种作用,以及患者会出现哪些不良反应。
确定抗抑郁药物治疗神经性疼痛的镇痛效果及安全性。未纳入偏头痛和头痛研究。
在MEDLINE(1966年至2003年12月)、EMBASE(1980年至2003年12月)、2004年第1期《 Cochr ane图书馆》中的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)以及Cochrane疼痛、姑息和支持治疗试验注册库(2002年5月)中检索抗抑郁药治疗神经性疼痛的随机试验。从检索到的论文参考文献列表中,并通过联系研究者来识别其他报告。
报告抗抑郁药物对成年患者镇痛效果的随机试验,对神经性疼痛进行主观疼痛评估。排除纳入慢性头痛和偏头痛患者的研究。
两名评价者对纳入研究达成一致,提取数据,并独立评估方法学质量。19种抗抑郁药的50项试验被认为符合纳入标准(2515例患者)。根据二分数据计算相对危险度(RR)估计值和治疗所需人数(NNT)以评估有效性和不良反应。
三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)是治疗神经性疼痛的有效药物。阿米替林实现至少中度疼痛缓解的NNT为2(95%可信区间1.7至2.5),RR为4.1(95%可信区间2.9 - 5.9)。新型选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂抗抑郁药(SSRI)有效性的证据有限。对于其他抗抑郁药如圣约翰草、文拉法辛和L-色氨酸,评估有效性证据的数据不足。对于糖尿病性神经病变,有效性的NNT为1.3(95%可信区间1.2至1.5),RR为12.4(95%可信区间5.2 - 29.2)(五项研究);对于带状疱疹后神经痛,NNT为2.2(95%可信区间1.7至3.1),RR为4.8(95%可信区间2.5 - 9.5)(三项研究)。有证据表明TCA对HIV相关神经病变无效。导致退出研究的重大不良反应的伤害所需人数(NNH)为16(95%可信区间:10 - 45)。轻微不良反应的NNH为4.6(95%可信区间3.3 - 6.7)
抗抑郁药对多种神经性疼痛有效。现有最佳证据支持阿米替林。关于SSRI有效性的数据有限。在进行更多关于SSRI的研究之前,无法确定最有效的抗抑郁药。