Yörükoğlu Dilek, Ateş Yeşim, Temiz Hulya, Yamali Hasan, Kecik Yuksel
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Jul;17(3):129-33. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000167146.13415.7c.
This prospective, blinded, placebo-controlled study was performed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of low-dose intrathecal and epidural morphine with paraspinal muscle infiltration of bupivacaine in lumbar discectomy cases. Eighty ASA I-III adult patients undergoing elective surgery for lumbar disc disease were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized to four groups by envelopes. Study groups were as follows: group 1 (n = 20), intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg; group 2 (n = 20), epidural morphine 2 mg; group 3 (n = 20), 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% paraspinal muscle infiltration; group 4 (n = 20), 30 mL of saline paraspinal muscle infiltration before wound closure. Recorded parameters were time to response to painful and verbal stimuli and postoperative pain assessed at 30 minutes and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS). Hemodynamic data, sedation scores, and side effects were also recorded. Meperidine and naproxen sodium were used for postoperative analgesia. Follow-up was performed by a blinded investigator. Mean VAS scores were lower in groups 1 and 2 at 30 minutes (P < 0.05). Mean VAS score of group 2 was lower than that of group 4 at 4 hours postoperatively (P < 0.05). Mean NPS scores were lower in groups 1 and 2 at 2, 4, and 6 hours (P < 0.05) and in group 2 at 8 hours compared with the other groups. The number of patients requiring meperidine at early postoperative phase (0-6 hours) was less in groups 1 and 2 compared with groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the late postoperative analgesic requirements, after correction for multiple testing. In conclusion, low-dose intrathecal and epidural morphine provide lower postoperative pain scores and a reduction in early postoperative analgesic requirement with insignificant side effects compared with paraspinal bupivacaine or saline infiltration.
本前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照研究旨在比较低剂量鞘内和硬膜外注射吗啡与布比卡因椎旁肌浸润用于腰椎间盘切除术患者术后镇痛的效果。80例接受择期腰椎间盘疾病手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-III级成年患者纳入本研究。患者通过信封随机分为四组。研究组如下:第1组(n = 20),鞘内注射吗啡0.1 mg;第2组(n = 20),硬膜外注射吗啡2 mg;第3组(n = 20),0.25%布比卡因30 mL椎旁肌浸润;第4组(n = 20),伤口缝合前30 mL生理盐水椎旁肌浸润。记录的参数包括对疼痛和言语刺激的反应时间,以及术后30分钟、2、4、6、8、12和24小时通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和数字疼痛评分法(NPS)评估的术后疼痛。还记录了血流动力学数据、镇静评分和副作用。哌替啶和萘普生钠用于术后镇痛。由一名双盲研究者进行随访。第1组和第2组在30分钟时的平均VAS评分较低(P < 0.05)。第2组术后4小时的平均VAS评分低于第4组(P < 0.05)。第1组和第2组在2、4和6小时时的平均NPS评分较低(P < 0.05),第2组在8小时时的平均NPS评分低于其他组。与第3组和第4组相比,第1组和第2组术后早期(0 - 6小时)需要哌替啶的患者数量较少(P < 0.05)。在进行多重检验校正后,术后晚期镇痛需求无统计学显著差异。总之,与椎旁布比卡因或生理盐水浸润相比,低剂量鞘内和硬膜外注射吗啡可提供更低的术后疼痛评分,并减少术后早期镇痛需求,且副作用不明显。