Biswas S, Tomar D, Rao D N
Malaria Research Centre (ICMR), Delhi, India.
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2005 Sep;99(6):553-62. doi: 10.1179/136485905X51463.
Although immunological tests based on the detection of histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) from the parasites permit the rapid diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria, such tests are not yet sufficiently sensitive to detect every bloodsmear-positive case. Some individuals infected with P. falciparum may appear test-negative because of the presence of anti-HRP2 antibodies in their sera. A longitudinal follow-up of HRP2 antigenaemia and antibody responses to this antigen has now been conducted in a group of 45, bloodsmear-positive malaria cases of various ages, both during acute infection with P. falciparum and after antimalarial treatment. Pre-treatment, 'day-0' samples of fingerprick blood were tested for HRP2 (in antigen-capture ELISA) and for antigen-specific IgM and IgG (in indirect ELISA). The patients were then treated, with standard doses of chloroquine, before being retested, for HRP2 and anti-HRP2 antibodies, on days 7, 15 and 28. The level of antigenaemia, which on day 0 was found to be positively correlated with parasitaemia (r = 0.741; P < 0.001), had only fallen by an insignificant amount by day 7 but showed further, significant falls between days 7 and 15 (P < 0.001) and between days 15 and 28 (P < 0.01). Although no significant relationship was observed between the blood concentrations of HRP2 and anti-HRP2 IgM or IgG on days 0 or 7, the level of HRP2 antigenaemia was found to be positively correlated with the concurrent titre of anti-HRP2 IgM on day 15 (r = 0.612; P < 0.001) and day 28 (r = 0.501; P < 0.001). The titres of HRP2-specific IgG gradually increased over the 28 days of follow-up but were not found to be significantly correlated with the decreasing levels of HRP2 antigenaemia. When the 45 day-0 samples of blood were tested for HRP2 in a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), three appeared negative, probably because of interference from the circulating, free, anti-HRP2 antibodies in the plasma. The three RDT-negative samples were significantly different from the 42 RDT-positive, having relatively low HRP2 antigenaemias (P < 0.001) and relatively high titres of anti-HRP2 IgM (P < 0.05) and IgG (P < 0.001). Control samples of blood, from four patients infected with P. vivax and five healthy, normal individuals, were considered ELISA-negative for HRP2 and anti-HRP2 IgM or IgG. It appears that, during human infection with P. falciparum, serum levels of HRP2 antigen remain elevated for at least 7 days post-treatment, despite the host's development of antigen-specific immune responses both before and after treatment.
基于检测疟原虫富含组氨酸蛋白2(HRP2)的免疫检测方法虽能快速诊断恶性疟原虫疟疾,但这些检测方法的灵敏度仍不足以检测出每一例血涂片阳性病例。一些感染恶性疟原虫的个体可能因血清中存在抗HRP2抗体而检测呈阴性。现已对一组45例不同年龄、血涂片阳性的疟疾病例进行了HRP2抗原血症及针对该抗原的抗体反应的纵向随访,随访时间涵盖恶性疟原虫急性感染期及抗疟治疗后。治疗前,即“第0天”,采集手指血样本检测HRP2(采用抗原捕获ELISA法)以及抗原特异性IgM和IgG(采用间接ELISA法)。然后,患者接受标准剂量氯喹治疗,之后在第7天、第15天和第28天再次检测HRP2和抗HRP2抗体。抗原血症水平在第0天与寄生虫血症呈正相关(r = 0.741;P < 0.001),到第7天时仅略有下降,但在第7天至第15天之间(P < 0.001)以及第15天至第28天之间(P < 0.01)出现了进一步显著下降。虽然在第0天或第7天未观察到HRP2血药浓度与抗HRP2 IgM或IgG之间存在显著关系,但发现HRP2抗原血症水平在第15天(r = 0.612;P < 0.001)和第28天(r = 0.501;P < 0.001)与同期抗HRP2 IgM滴度呈正相关。在28天的随访期间,HRP2特异性IgG滴度逐渐升高,但未发现其与HRP2抗原血症水平的下降存在显著相关性。当采用快速诊断检测(RDT)法对45份第0天的血样进行HRP2检测时,有3份呈阴性,这可能是由于血浆中循环的游离抗HRP2抗体产生了干扰。这3份RDT阴性样本与42份RDT阳性样本存在显著差异,其HRP2抗原血症水平相对较低(P < 0.001),抗HRP2 IgM(P < 0.05)和IgG(P < 0.001)滴度相对较高。来自4例间日疟原虫感染患者和5名健康正常个体的对照血样在ELISA检测中HRP2及抗HRP2 IgM或IgG均为阴性。看来,在人类感染恶性疟原虫期间,尽管宿主在治疗前后均产生了抗原特异性免疫反应,但治疗后血清中HRP2抗原水平至少在7天内仍保持升高。