Suppr超能文献

根据雌激素受体和孕激素受体联合状态的乳腺癌风险因素。

Breast cancer risk factors according to joint estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status.

作者信息

Rusiecki Jennifer A, Holford Theodore R, Zahm Shelia H, Zheng Tongzhang

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Detect Prev. 2005;29(5):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Sep 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated risk factor patterns for subtypes of breast cancer characterized by joint estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status in a hospital-based case-control study.

METHODS

ER and PR tumor status were determined immunohisotchemically. Risk factors of interest were entered into a multiple polychotomous logistic regression model simultaneously; odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Using this model, cases in the four tumor subtypes (ER+PR+, ER-PR-, ER+PR-, ER-PR+) were compared simultaneously to controls. A Wald test for heterogeneity across the four subtypes was conducted, as well as a case-case comparison between the two most biologically disparate subtypes, ER+PR+ and ER-PR-.

RESULTS

The receptor status distribution was as follows: 33% ER+PR+, 34% ER-PR-, 20% ER+PR-, and 13% ER-PR+. Among 317 cases and 401 controls, we found significant heterogeneity across the four tumor subtypes for older age at first full-term pregnancy (p=0.04) and post-menopausal status (p=0.04). For older age at first full-term pregnancy, an elevated risk was found for the ER+PR- subtype (OR=2.5; 95% CI: 1.2-5.1). For post-menopausal status, elevated risks were found for both the ER+PR+ (OR=2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-4.9) and ER+PR- (OR=7.2; 95% CI: 2.4-21.7) subtypes. From the case-case comparisons, we found that cases, who had consumed alcohol for more than 1 year were 3.4 times more likely to have ER+PR+ tumors than ER-PR- tumors (95% CI: 1.4-8.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain breast cancer risk factors may vary by ER and PR status, and joint ER/PR status should be taken into account in future studies of risk factor estimates.

摘要

背景

在一项基于医院的病例对照研究中,我们调查了以联合雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR)状态为特征的乳腺癌亚型的危险因素模式。

方法

通过免疫组织化学法确定ER和PR肿瘤状态。将感兴趣的危险因素同时纳入多元多分类逻辑回归模型;计算比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。使用该模型,将四种肿瘤亚型(ER+PR+、ER-PR-、ER+PR-、ER-PR+)的病例与对照同时进行比较。对四种亚型之间的异质性进行了Wald检验,以及两种生物学差异最大的亚型ER+PR+和ER-PR-之间的病例-病例比较。

结果

受体状态分布如下:33%为ER+PR+,34%为ER-PR-,20%为ER+PR-,13%为ER-PR+。在317例病例和401例对照中,我们发现首次足月妊娠年龄较大(p=0.04)和绝经后状态(p=0.04)在四种肿瘤亚型之间存在显著异质性。对于首次足月妊娠年龄较大的情况,ER+PR-亚型的风险升高(OR=2.5;95%CI:1.2-5.1)。对于绝经后状态,ER+PR+(OR=2.4;95%CI:1.1-4.9)和ER+PR-(OR=7.2;95%CI:2.4-21.7)亚型的风险均升高。从病例-病例比较中,我们发现饮酒超过1年的病例患ER+PR+肿瘤的可能性是患ER-PR-肿瘤的3.4倍(95%CI:1.4-8.4)。

结论

某些乳腺癌危险因素可能因ER和PR状态而异,在未来的危险因素评估研究中应考虑联合ER/PR状态。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验