Fallone Gahan, Acebo Christine, Seifer Ronald, Carskadon Mary A
E. P. Bradley Hospital, East Providence, RI, USA.
Sleep. 2005 Dec;28(12):1561-7. doi: 10.1093/sleep/28.12.1561.
To determine the effects of experimental restriction of sleep opportunity on teacher ratings of academic performance and behavior in healthy normal children.
Home-based, within-subjects design in which participants followed 3 week-long sleep schedules-Baseline (self-selected), Optimized, and Restricted-while attending school, with order of conditions counter-balanced (Optimized and Restricted).
Seventy-four children (39 boys; aged 6 to 12 years, mean = 10) screened for medical and psychological health.
Teachers masked to assigned hours of sleep completed paper-and-pencil questionnaires at the end of each study condition. Questionnaire items were selected from several published measures. Summary scores included Academic Problems, Hyperactive-Impulsive Behaviors, Internalizing, Oppositional-Aggressive, Sleepiness, Total Attention Problems, and Mean Severity of Attention Problems. Main effects of sleep condition were found forAcademic Problems, Sleepiness, Total Attention Problems, and Mean Severity of Attention Problems. Restricting sleep increased ratings of Academic Problems (medium effect) relative to both Baseline (P < .01, eta(p)2 = .11) and Optimized (P < .05, eta(p)2 = .10) conditions and increased the Mean Severity of Attention Problems (medium effect) relative to Baseline (P < .01, eta(p)2 = .12).
These findings provide experimental support for widely held beliefs about the importance of sufficient time-in-bed for academic functioning in children. Reducing sleep opportunity had a direct effect on academic performance, as rated by teachers, even among healthy students with no history of behavioral problems or academic difficulty. Findings also support insufficient sleep as a direct source of variability in the manifestation of attention problems but not hyperactivity.
确定实验性睡眠机会限制对健康正常儿童学业成绩和行为的教师评分的影响。
基于家庭的受试者内设计,参与者在上学期间遵循3个为期一周的睡眠时间表——基线(自我选择)、优化和限制,条件顺序进行平衡(优化和限制)。
74名儿童(39名男孩;年龄6至12岁,平均 = 10岁)经过医学和心理健康筛查。
对分配的睡眠时间不知情的教师在每个研究条件结束时完成纸笔问卷。问卷项目选自多项已发表的测量方法。汇总分数包括学业问题、多动冲动行为、内化、对立攻击、嗜睡、总注意力问题以及注意力问题的平均严重程度。在学业问题、嗜睡、总注意力问题以及注意力问题的平均严重程度方面发现了睡眠条件的主要影响。相对于基线(P <.01,η(p)2 =.11)和优化(P <.05,η(p)2 =.10)条件,限制睡眠增加了学业问题评分(中等效应),并且相对于基线(P <.01,η(p)2 =.12)增加了注意力问题的平均严重程度(中等效应)。
这些发现为关于充足卧床时间对儿童学业功能重要性的广泛观点提供了实验支持。减少睡眠机会对教师评定的学业成绩有直接影响,即使在没有行为问题或学业困难史的健康学生中也是如此。研究结果还支持睡眠不足是注意力问题而非多动表现变化的直接原因。