Blakely Martin L, Tyson Jon E, Lally Kevin P, McDonald Scott, Stoll Barbara J, Stevenson David K, Poole W Kenneth, Jobe Alan H, Wright Linda L, Higgins Rosemary D
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e680-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1273. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
Extremely low birth weight (ELBW; < or =1000 g) infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or isolated intestinal perforation (IP) are treated surgically with either initial laparotomy or peritoneal drain placement. The only published data comparing these therapies are from small, retrospective, single-center studies that do not address outcomes beyond nursery discharge. The objective of this study was to conduct a prospective, multicenter, observational study to (1) develop a hypothesis about the relative effect of these 2 therapies on risk-adjusted outcomes through 18 to 22 months in ELBW infants and (2) to obtain data that would be useful in designing and conducting a successful trial of this hypothesis.
A prospective, cohort study was conducted at 16 clinical centers within the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. To assist in risk adjustment, the attending pediatric surgeon recorded the preoperative diagnosis and intraoperative diagnosis and identified infants who were considered to be too ill for laparotomy. Predefined measures of short- and longer-term outcome included (1) either predischarge death or prolonged parenteral nutrition (>85 days) after enrollment and (2) either death or neurodevelopmental impairment on a standardized examination at 18 to 22 months' adjusted age.
Severe NEC or IP occurred in 156 (5.2%) of 2987 ELBW infants; 80 were treated with initial drainage, and 76 were treated with initial laparotomy. By 18 to 22 months, 78 (50%) had died; 112 (72%) had died or were shown to be impaired. Outcome was worse in the subgroup with NEC. Laparotomy was never performed in 76% (28 of 36) of drain-treated survivors.
Drainage was commonly used, and outcome was poor. Our findings, particularly the risk-adjusted odds ratio favoring laparotomy for death or impairment, indicate the need for a large, multicenter clinical trial to assess the effect of the initial surgical therapy on outcome at > or =18 months.
极低出生体重(ELBW;≤1000克)且患有坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)或孤立性肠穿孔(IP)的婴儿,手术治疗方式为初始剖腹手术或放置腹腔引流管。唯一比较这两种治疗方法的已发表数据来自小型、回顾性、单中心研究,这些研究未涉及出院后的结局。本研究的目的是进行一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究,以(1)针对这两种治疗方法对ELBW婴儿18至22个月风险调整后结局的相对影响提出假设,以及(2)获取有助于设计和开展该假设成功试验的数据。
在美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络的16个临床中心进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。为协助进行风险调整,主治儿科外科医生记录术前诊断和术中诊断,并确定被认为病情过重无法进行剖腹手术的婴儿。短期和长期结局的预定义指标包括(1)入组后出院前死亡或长期肠外营养(>85天),以及(2)在矫正年龄18至22个月时标准化检查中的死亡或神经发育障碍。
2987例ELBW婴儿中有156例(5.2%)发生严重NEC或IP;80例接受初始引流治疗,76例接受初始剖腹手术治疗。到18至22个月时,78例(50%)死亡;112例(72%)死亡或有损伤表现。NEC亚组的结局更差。在接受引流治疗的幸存者中,76%(36例中的28例)从未接受过剖腹手术。
引流术常用,但结局不佳。我们的研究结果,尤其是风险调整后的优势比表明剖腹手术在死亡或损伤方面更具优势,这表明需要进行一项大型多中心临床试验,以评估初始手术治疗对18个月及以上结局的影响。