Berhe Tseghai, Postellon Daniel, Wilson Bruce, Stone Roberta
Department of Pediatrics, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):2132-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2363.
Although insulin pump therapy has been successful in adults, adolescents and school children, its use has been limited in young children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the glycemic control, safety and efficacy of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion via pump in young children (2-7 years old) with type 1 diabetes who were transitioned from twice-a-day insulin injection (neutral protamine Hagedorn/Lente + Humalog/Novalog) to insulin pump therapy. Hemoglobin A1c, BMI, average fasting blood glucose, episodes of severe hypoglycemia, episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis, episodes of lipohypertrophy, blood glucose variability, and number of sick day calls were compared before and after insulin pump therapy.
Data were collected retrospectively by chart review over a 2-year period during quarterly diabetes clinic visits from 33 patients who were managed on neutral protamine Hagedorn/Lente + Humalog/Novolog twice-a-day injections for at least 1 year prior to transitioning to insulin pump therapy.
There was a significant improvement in the average hemoglobin A1c after continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy. The average fasting blood sugar was lower in the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion group. Severe episodes of hypoglycemia and episodes of lipohypertrophy were significantly higher before insulin pump therapy initiation. There were significantly fewer sick day calls after continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Blood sugar variability improved significantly after insulin pump therapy. There was no significant difference in BMI or amount of carbohydrate consumed. None of the patients experienced diabetic ketoacidosis requiring emergency treatment before or after insulin pump therapy.
Continous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes is a safe, effective and superior alternative to a twice-a-day insulin regimen.
尽管胰岛素泵疗法在成人、青少年和学龄儿童中已取得成功,但其在幼儿中的应用却受到限制。本研究的目的是评估连续皮下胰岛素输注泵对1型糖尿病幼儿(2至7岁)的血糖控制、安全性和有效性,这些幼儿从每日两次胰岛素注射(中效低精蛋白胰岛素/慢胰岛素锌悬液 + 赖脯胰岛素/门冬胰岛素)转换为胰岛素泵治疗。比较胰岛素泵治疗前后的糖化血红蛋白、体重指数、平均空腹血糖、严重低血糖发作次数、糖尿病酮症酸中毒发作次数、脂肪增生发作次数、血糖变异性和因病请假天数。
通过回顾性图表审查收集数据,这些数据来自33例患者,他们在转换为胰岛素泵治疗前至少1年接受每日两次中效低精蛋白胰岛素/慢胰岛素锌悬液 + 赖脯胰岛素/门冬胰岛素注射治疗,在为期2年的季度糖尿病门诊就诊期间收集这些数据。
连续皮下胰岛素输注治疗后,平均糖化血红蛋白有显著改善。连续皮下胰岛素输注组的平均空腹血糖较低。在开始胰岛素泵治疗前,严重低血糖发作次数和脂肪增生发作次数显著更高。连续皮下胰岛素输注后因病请假天数显著减少。胰岛素泵治疗后血糖变异性显著改善。体重指数或碳水化合物摄入量没有显著差异。在胰岛素泵治疗前后,没有患者发生需要紧急治疗的糖尿病酮症酸中毒。
对于1型糖尿病幼儿,连续皮下胰岛素输注治疗是一种安全、有效且优于每日两次胰岛素治疗方案的替代方法。