Shaw Philip, Sporn Alex, Gogtay Nitin, Overman Gerald P, Greenstein Deanna, Gochman Peter, Tossell Julia W, Lenane Marge, Rapoport Judith L
Child Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1500, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):721-30. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.721.
Childhood-onset schizophrenia is a rare but severe form of the disorder that is frequently treatment resistant. The psychiatrist has a limited evidence base to guide treatment, particularly as there are no trials in children comparing atypical antipsychotics, the mainstay of current treatment.
To compare the efficacy and safety of olanzapine and clozapine, hypothesizing that clozapine would be more efficacious.
Double-blind randomized 8-week controlled trial, with a 2-year open-label follow-up.
National Institute of Mental Health study, January 1998 to June 2005. Patients underwent reassessment 2 years after discharge.
Children and adolescents recruited nationally, aged 7 to 16 years, meeting unmodified DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, and resistant to treatment with at least 2 antipsychotics.
After drug washout and a 1- to 3-week antipsychotic-free period, patients were randomized to treatment with clozapine (n = 12) or olanzapine (n = 13).
The Clinical Global Impression Severity of Symptoms Scale and Schedule for the Assessment of Negative/Positive Symptoms.
Clozapine was associated with a significant reduction in all outcome measures, whereas olanzapine showed a less consistent profile of clinical improvement. While there were moderate to large differential treatment effects in favor of clozapine, these reached significance only in the alleviation of negative symptoms from an antipsychotic-free baseline (P = .04; effect size, 0.89). Clozapine was associated with more overall adverse events. At 2-year follow-up, 15 patients were receiving clozapine with evidence of sustained clinical improvement, but additional adverse events emerged, including lipid anomalies (n = 6) and seizures (n = 1).
While not demonstrating definitively the superiority of clozapine compared with olanzapine in treatment-refractory childhood-onset schizophrenia, the study suggests that clozapine has a more favorable profile of clinical response, which is balanced against more associated adverse events.
儿童期起病的精神分裂症是一种罕见但严重的疾病形式,常常对治疗有抵抗性。精神科医生用于指导治疗的证据基础有限,尤其是因为目前尚无针对儿童比较非典型抗精神病药物(当前治疗的主要手段)的试验。
比较奥氮平和氯氮平的疗效与安全性,假设氯氮平疗效更佳。
双盲随机8周对照试验,并有2年的开放标签随访。
国立精神卫生研究所研究,1998年1月至2005年6月。患者出院2年后接受重新评估。
全国招募的7至16岁儿童和青少年,符合未经修改的精神分裂症DSM-IV标准,且对至少2种抗精神病药物治疗有抵抗性。
在药物洗脱及1至3周无抗精神病药物期后,患者被随机分配接受氯氮平治疗(n = 12)或奥氮平治疗(n = 13)。
临床总体印象症状严重程度量表及阴性/阳性症状评估表。
氯氮平与所有结局指标的显著降低相关,而奥氮平显示出不太一致的临床改善情况。虽然存在中度至较大的有利于氯氮平的差异治疗效果,但仅在从无抗精神病药物基线缓解阴性症状方面达到显著水平(P = .04;效应量,0.89)。氯氮平与更多的总体不良事件相关。在2年随访时,15名接受氯氮平治疗的患者有持续临床改善的证据,但出现了额外的不良事件,包括脂质异常(n = 6)和癫痫发作(n = 1)。
虽然该研究未明确证明氯氮平在难治性儿童期起病的精神分裂症治疗中优于奥氮平,但研究表明氯氮平有更有利的临床反应情况,不过需权衡更多相关不良事件。