Attal N, Cruccu G, Haanpää M, Hansson P, Jensen T S, Nurmikko T, Sampaio C, Sindrup S, Wiffen P
Centre d'Evaluation at de Traitement de la Douleur, Hôspital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Eur J Neurol. 2006 Nov;13(11):1153-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01511.x.
Neuropathic pain treatment remains unsatisfactory despite a substantial increase in the number of trials. This EFNS Task Force aimed at evaluating the existing evidence about the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Studies were identified using first the Cochrane Database then Medline. Trials were classified according to the aetiological condition. All class I and II controlled trials (according to EFNS classification of evidence) were assessed, but lower-class studies were considered in conditions that had no top level studies. Only treatments feasible in an outpatient setting were evaluated. Effects on pain symptoms/signs, quality of life and comorbidities were particularly searched for. Most of the randomized controlled trials included patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and painful polyneuropathies (PPN) mainly caused by diabetes. These trials provide level A evidence for the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, pregabalin and opioids, with a large number of class I trials, followed by topical lidocaine (in PHN) and the newer antidepressants venlafaxine and duloxetine (in PPN). A small number of controlled trials were performed in central pain, trigeminal neuralgia, other peripheral neuropathic pain states and multiple-aetiology neuropathic pains. The main peripheral pain conditions respond similarly well to tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, and pregabalin, but some conditions, such as HIV-associated polyneuropathy, are more refractory. There are too few studies on central pain, combination therapy, and head-to-head comparison. For future trials, we recommend to assess quality of life and pain symptoms or signs with standardized tools.
尽管试验数量大幅增加,但神经性疼痛的治疗仍不尽人意。该欧洲神经病学学会(EFNS)特别工作组旨在评估关于神经性疼痛药物治疗的现有证据。首先使用Cochrane数据库,然后使用Medline来检索研究。试验根据病因进行分类。对所有I类和II类对照试验(根据EFNS证据分类)进行评估,但在没有顶级研究的情况下会考虑低级别研究。仅评估在门诊环境中可行的治疗方法。特别关注对疼痛症状/体征、生活质量和合并症的影响。大多数随机对照试验纳入了带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)患者以及主要由糖尿病引起的疼痛性多发性神经病(PPN)患者。这些试验为三环类抗抑郁药、加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林和阿片类药物的疗效提供了A级证据,有大量I类试验,其次是局部用利多卡因(用于PHN)以及新型抗抑郁药文拉法辛和度洛西汀(用于PPN)。在中枢性疼痛、三叉神经痛、其他周围神经性疼痛状态和多病因神经性疼痛方面进行了少量对照试验。主要的周围性疼痛病症对三环类抗抑郁药、加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林的反应同样良好,但某些病症,如与HIV相关的多发性神经病,更难治疗。关于中枢性疼痛、联合治疗和直接比较的研究太少。对于未来的试验,我们建议使用标准化工具评估生活质量和疼痛症状或体征。