Schmidt Lone
University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Denmark.
Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417.
Clinically a couple is considered to be infertile after at least one year without contraception and without pregnancy. There was scant knowledge about the prevalences of infertility, involuntary childlessness and the seeking of fertility treatment and only few longitudinal studies about the psychosocial consequences of infertility and its treatment. This thesis is about the epidemiological aspects of infertility; the conceptualization and measurement of important psychosocial aspects of infertility; and a medical sociological analysis of the associations between these psychosocial variables among Danish women and men in fertility treatment. The thesis is based on nine papers. The three main purposes were: (i) to review critically, population based studies of infertility and medical care seeking in industrialised countries. Further, to examine these prevalences and subsequent motherhood among women in former assisted reproduction in a Danish population. (ii) To develop measures of psychosocial consequences of infertility: fertility problem stress, marital benefit, communication, coping strategies, attitudes to and evaluation of fertility treatment. (iii) To examine these phenomena and to analyse their interrelations among Danish women and men in fertility treatment. The thesis is based on four empirical studies: (i) The Women and Health Survey, a cross-sectional population-based study among 15-44 year old women (n=907, 25-44 year old) in Copenhagen County, 1989. (ii) The Psychosocial Infertility Interview Study, a qualitative interview study among 16 couples (n=2 participants) infertility treatment at The Fertility Clinic, Herlev University Hospital,1992. (iii) The Infertility Cohort, a longitudinal cohort study consecutively including all couples (n=250 participants) beginning anew fertility treatment period at one of four public (Braedstrup, Herlev, Odense, Rigshospitalet) and one private fertility clinic (Trianglen),2000-2002. (iv) The Communication and Stress Management Training Programme, an intervention study among couples(n=74 participants) in fertility treatment at The Fertility Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2001-2003. Included is also a literature review of population-based infertility studies from industrialised countries. Data from (iii) and (iv) are studies from The Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) Research Programme (www.compipro.dk). Epidemiological and demographic studies investigating the prevalences of infertility differed in how they defined the numerator (the infertile participants) and the denominator (the population at risk). It was important to calculate reliable estimates of the infertility prevalence by including only women who had tried to have at least one child in the population at risk, as a notable proportion of women in the fertile ages had not (yet) attempted to become a mother. The lifetime prevalence of infertility in the representative population-based study was 26.4%. In the age group 35 to 44 years 5.8% were primarily involuntarily in fecund (involuntarily childless). Even in a country with access to fertility treatment in a public health-care system without self-payment lower education was a predictor of lower treatment seeking. In the cohort study (2000-2002)of couples starting a new period of assisted reproduction treatment 62.6% reported a treatment-related pregnancy at the one-year follow-up. In total 32.4% reported a treatment-related delivery. In total 24.2% reported a current continuing pregnancy and spontaneous pregnancies accounted for 2.7% of these. We developed measures of fertility problem stress, marital benefit(that infertility has brought the partners closer together and strengthened their marriage), partner communication, infertility related communication, coping strategies, attitudes to fertility treatment and evaluation of care. The medical sociological analyses showed that the variables of psychosocial consequences of infertility and treatment are interwoven with each others in a complex pattern, a pattern that both differed and was similar when comparing women and men. The infertility-related communication strategy (secrecy, formal, open-minded)identified in the qualitative interviews was later confirmed in the COMPI Infertility Cohort. Using the formal strategy and not talking about the emotional aspects of infertility and its treatment suggested high fertility problem stress. The coping strategies studied showed significant social differences and active-avoidance coping was a significant predictor of high fertility problem stress. A positive effect of infertility on the marriage, marital benefit was common. Men using the secrecy communication strategy had increased risk of low marital benefit. Difficult partner communication was a significant predictor of high fertility problem stress and among men, of low marital benefit. The intervention study showed that it was possible for the participants to change their communication with partner and other people close to them and that participants achieved an increased awareness of what, how much and when to discuss with others. High fertility problem stress and high marital benefit were associated with high importance ratings of patient-centred care and intentions to use professional psychosocial services. Among women, high fertility problem stress was a predictor of lower satisfaction ratings with fertility treatment. High marital benefit was a predictor of high satisfaction ratings of both medical and patient-centred care. In conclusion, infertility is a common experience among couples attempting to become parents. Assisted reproduction in the public health-care system in Denmark has high success rates, i.e. pregnancies,deliveries and high patient satisfaction. A large minority of people in fertility treatment experience high fertility problem stress,and some use communication and coping strategies that predicts high stress. Developing and evaluating different psychosocial interventions are necessary to offer the psychosocial support needed for this minority of fertility patients.
临床上,一对夫妇在未采取避孕措施且未怀孕至少一年后被认为不孕。关于不孕、非自愿无子女以及寻求生育治疗的患病率,人们了解甚少,而且关于不孕及其治疗的心理社会后果的纵向研究也很少。本论文围绕不孕的流行病学方面展开;不孕重要心理社会方面的概念化与测量;以及对丹麦接受生育治疗的女性和男性中这些心理社会变量之间关联的医学社会学分析。本论文基于九篇论文。三个主要目的是:(i)批判性地回顾工业化国家基于人群的不孕及寻求医疗护理的研究。此外,研究丹麦人群中曾接受辅助生殖的女性的这些患病率及随后的生育情况。(ii)制定不孕心理社会后果的测量指标:生育问题压力、婚姻益处、沟通、应对策略、对生育治疗的态度及评估。(iii)研究丹麦接受生育治疗的女性和男性中的这些现象并分析它们之间的相互关系。本论文基于四项实证研究:(i)1989年在哥本哈根郡对15 - 44岁女性(n = 907,25 - 44岁)开展的基于人群的横断面女性与健康调查。(ii)1992年在赫勒夫大学医院生育诊所对16对(n = 2名参与者)接受不孕治疗的夫妇进行的定性访谈研究。(iii)不孕队列研究,2000 - 2002年连续纳入所有在四家公立(布勒斯特鲁普、赫勒夫、欧登塞、里格霍斯皮塔利特)和一家私立生育诊所(三角诊所)开始新的生育治疗周期的夫妇(n = 250名参与者)。(iv)沟通与压力管理培训项目,2001 - 2003年在里格霍斯皮塔利特朱莉安·玛丽中心生育诊所对接受生育治疗的夫妇(n = 74名参与者)进行的干预研究。其中还包括对工业化国家基于人群的不孕研究的文献综述。(iii)和(iv)的数据来自哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕(COMPI)研究项目(www.compipro.dk)。调查不孕患病率的流行病学和人口统计学研究在如何定义分子(不孕参与者)和分母(风险人群)方面存在差异。通过仅将在风险人群中试图生育至少一个孩子的女性纳入来计算不孕患病率的可靠估计值很重要,因为育龄期有相当比例的女性尚未尝试成为母亲。在具有代表性的基于人群的研究中,不孕的终生患病率为26.4%。在35至44岁年龄组中,5.8%主要是非自愿不孕(非自愿无子女)。即使在一个公共医疗系统中可获得生育治疗且无需自费的国家,低教育水平也是寻求治疗较少的一个预测因素。在2000 - 2002年对开始新的辅助生殖治疗周期的夫妇进行的队列研究中,62.6%在一年随访时报告有与治疗相关的妊娠。总计32.4%报告有与治疗相关的分娩。总计24.2%报告当前持续妊娠,其中自然妊娠占2.7%。我们制定了生育问题压力、婚姻益处(不孕使伴侣关系更亲密并加强了他们的婚姻)、伴侣沟通、与不孕相关的沟通、应对策略、对生育治疗的态度及护理评估的测量指标。医学社会学分析表明,不孕及其治疗的心理社会后果变量以复杂的模式相互交织,在比较女性和男性时,这种模式既有不同之处也有相似之处。定性访谈中确定的与不孕相关的沟通策略(保密、正式、开放)后来在COMPI不孕队列中得到证实。采用正式策略且不谈论不孕及其治疗的情感方面表明生育问题压力较高。所研究的应对策略显示出显著的社会差异,积极回避应对是生育问题压力较高的一个显著预测因素。不孕对婚姻有积极影响,婚姻益处很常见。采用保密沟通策略的男性婚姻益处较低的风险增加。困难伴侣沟通是生育问题压力较高的一个显著预测因素,在男性中,也是婚姻益处较低的一个显著预测因素。干预研究表明,参与者有可能改变与伴侣及其他亲近之人的沟通方式,并且参与者对与他人讨论什么、讨论多少以及何时讨论有了更高的认识。生育问题压力高和婚姻益处高与以患者为中心的护理的高重要性评分以及使用专业心理社会服务的意愿相关。在女性中,生育问题压力高是对生育治疗满意度评分较低的一个预测因素。婚姻益处高是对医疗护理和以患者为中心的护理满意度评分高的一个预测因素。总之,不孕在试图成为父母的夫妇中是一种常见经历。丹麦公共医疗系统中的辅助生殖成功率很高,即妊娠、分娩率高且患者满意度高。接受生育治疗的一大部分人经历了较高的生育问题压力,一些人采用的沟通和应对策略预示着高压力。开发和评估不同的心理社会干预措施对于为这一小部分生育患者提供所需的心理社会支持是必要的。