Falagas Matthew E, Bliziotis Ioannis A, Kondilis Barbara, Soteriades Elpidoforos S
Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), Athens, Greece.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2006 Dec;22(12):1199-205. doi: 10.1089/aid.2006.22.1199.
The scientific community invests significant resources on HIV/AIDS research to confront the current epidemic. We reviewed the medical literature in order to evaluate the contribution of different world regions on HIV/AIDS research during the past 18 years. We retrieved articles, using an elaborate methodology, from three journals focusing on HIV/AIDS between 1986 and 2003, indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and the Web of Science databases of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Comparisons were made by dividing the world into nine geographic regions, and by using the human development index (HDI) categorization. A total of 9502 articles on HIV/AIDS were retrieved from three AIDS journals over an 18-year study period. The United States and Western Europe together and five developed out of nine world regions made up a striking 83% and 92% of the world's research production on HIV/AIDS, respectively. Scientists from the developing world participated in 10.4% of the articles published during 1986-1991, 14.7% during 1992-1997, and 21.3% during 1998-2003. Researchers from countries included in the high, medium, and low HDI category produced 2240, 9, and 15 articles per billion population, respectively. About half of articles originating in Latin America and the Caribbean and half in Asia were produced in collaboration with the United States. However, 40% of articles from Africa and 58% from Eastern Europe were produced in cooperation with Western Europe. Collaboration between researchers within developing regions was negligible. The vast majority of the world's research on AIDS is produced in the developed world. Although research production was minimal in the developing world, we found that regions included in the low and medium HDI categories showed a higher proportion of increase in research productivity than the developed countries. International collaborations should significantly increase and expand beyond the traditional cultural and political lines of international relationships.
科学界投入大量资源进行艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究,以应对当前的疫情。我们回顾了医学文献,以评估过去18年中世界不同地区对艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究的贡献。我们采用精心设计的方法,从1986年至2003年期间聚焦于艾滋病毒/艾滋病的三种期刊中检索文章,这些期刊被收录在《期刊引证报告》(JCR)以及科学信息研究所(ISI)的《科学引文索引》数据库中。通过将世界划分为九个地理区域,并使用人类发展指数(HDI)分类进行比较。在为期18年的研究期间,从三种艾滋病期刊中总共检索到9502篇关于艾滋病毒/艾滋病的文章。美国和西欧合计,以及九个世界区域中的五个发达地区,分别占世界艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究成果的83%和92%,令人瞩目。发展中世界的科学家在1986 - 1991年期间发表的文章中占10.4%,在1992 - 1997年期间占14.7%,在1998 - 2003年期间占21.3%。高、中、低人类发展指数类别的国家的研究人员每十亿人口分别发表2240篇、9篇和15篇文章。拉丁美洲和加勒比地区以及亚洲约一半的文章是与美国合作完成的。然而,非洲40%的文章和东欧58%的文章是与西欧合作完成的。发展中地区内部研究人员之间的合作可以忽略不计。世界上绝大多数关于艾滋病的研究是在发达世界进行的。尽管发展中世界的研究成果很少,但我们发现,低人类发展指数和中等人类发展指数类别的地区在研究生产力方面的增长比例高于发达国家。国际合作应大幅增加,并超越传统的文化和政治国际关系界限进行扩展。