Kale Gaurav, Kijchavengkul Thitisilp, Auras Rafael, Rubino Maria, Selke Susan E, Singh Sher Paul
School of Packaging, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823-1223, USA.
Macromol Biosci. 2007 Mar 8;7(3):255-77. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200600168.
Packaging waste accounted for 78.81 million tons or 31.6% of the total municipal solid waste (MSW) in 2003 in the USA, 56.3 million tons or 25% of the MSW in 2005 in Europe, and 3.3 million tons or 10% of the MSW in 2004 in Australia. Currently, in the USA the dominant method of packaging waste disposal is landfill, followed by recycling, incineration, and composting. Since landfill occupies valuable space and results in the generation of greenhouse gases and contaminants, recovery methods such as reuse, recycling and/or composting are encouraged as a way of reducing packaging waste disposal. Most of the common materials used in packaging (i.e., steel, aluminum, glass, paper, paperboard, plastics, and wood) can be efficiently recovered by recycling; however, if packaging materials are soiled with foods or other biological substances, physical recycling of these materials may be impractical. Therefore, composting some of these packaging materials is a promising way to reduce MSW. As biopolymers are developed and increasingly used in applications such as food, pharmaceutical, and consumer goods packaging, composting could become one of the prevailing methods for disposal of packaging waste provided that industry, governments, and consumers encourage and embrace this alternative. The main objective of this article is to provide an overview of the current situation of packaging compostability, to describe the main mechanisms that make a biopolymer compostable, to delineate the main methods to compost these biomaterials, and to explain the main standards for assessing compostability, and the current status of biopolymer labeling. Biopolymers such as polylactide and poly(hydroxybutyrate) are increasingly becoming available for use in food, medical, and consumer goods packaging applications. The main claims of these new biomaterials are that they are obtained from renewable resources and that they can be biodegraded in biological environments such as soil and compost. Although recycling could be energetically more favorable than composting for these materials, it may not be practical because of excessive sorting and cleaning requirements. Therefore, the main focus is to dispose them by composting. So far, there is no formal agreement between companies, governments and consumers as to how this packaging composting will take place; therefore, the main drivers for their use have been green marketing and pseudo-environmental consciousness related to high fuel prices. Packaging compostability could be an alternative for the disposal of biobased materials as long as society as a whole is willing to formally address the challenge to clearly understand the cradle-to-grave life of a compostable package, and to include these new compostable polymers in food, manure, or yard waste composting facilities.
2003年,在美国,包装废弃物占城市固体废弃物总量的31.6%,达7881万吨;2005年,在欧洲,包装废弃物占城市固体废弃物总量的25%,为5630万吨;2004年,在澳大利亚,包装废弃物占城市固体废弃物总量的10%,为330万吨。目前,在美国,包装废弃物的主要处置方式是填埋,其次是回收利用、焚烧和堆肥。由于填埋占用宝贵空间并会产生温室气体和污染物,因此鼓励采用诸如再利用、回收和/或堆肥等回收方法,以减少包装废弃物的处置。包装中使用的大多数常见材料(即钢铁、铝、玻璃、纸张、纸板、塑料和木材)都可以通过回收高效回收;然而,如果包装材料被食物或其他生物物质弄脏,对这些材料进行物理回收可能不切实际。因此,对其中一些包装材料进行堆肥是减少城市固体废弃物的一种有前景的方法。随着生物聚合物的开发并越来越多地用于食品、药品和消费品包装等应用中,只要行业、政府和消费者鼓励并接受这种替代方法,堆肥可能会成为包装废弃物处置的主要方法之一。本文的主要目的是概述包装可堆肥性的现状,描述使生物聚合物具有可堆肥性的主要机制,阐述堆肥这些生物材料的主要方法,并解释评估可堆肥性的主要标准以及生物聚合物标签的现状。聚乳酸和聚羟基丁酸酯等生物聚合物越来越多地用于食品、医疗和消费品包装应用。这些新型生物材料的主要特点是它们源自可再生资源,并且可以在土壤和堆肥等生物环境中生物降解。尽管对于这些材料而言,回收在能源利用方面可能比堆肥更有利,但由于对分类和清洁要求过高,可能不切实际。因此,主要重点是通过堆肥来处置它们。到目前为止,公司、政府和消费者之间尚未就这种包装堆肥的方式达成正式协议;因此,推动其使用的主要因素一直是绿色营销以及与高油价相关的伪环保意识。只要整个社会愿意正式应对挑战,清楚了解可堆肥包装从摇篮到坟墓的生命周期,并将这些新型可堆肥聚合物纳入食品、粪便或庭院废弃物堆肥设施中,包装可堆肥性就可以成为生物基材料处置的一种替代方法。