Sansom Guy W
Medical Displan Victoria, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Apr;19(2):86-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00927.x.
Recent events have led to a revision in ED equipment, preparedness and training for disasters. However, clinicians must still decide when, and what level of personal protection is required when a toxic threat exists. If possible, clear, simple and achievable protocols are required in such situations. Following an off-site Australasian chemical biological or radiological incident, current evidence indicates that the initial receiving ED staff will be adequately protected from all known chemical biological and radiological inhalational threats by wearing a properly fitted P2 (N95) mask, or its equivalent. Protection from serious contact injury is offered by wearing double gloves, disposable fluid-repellent coveralls or gown, eye protection, surgical mask, and ideally, a cap and shoe covers; in conjunction with universal precautions and procedures.
近期事件促使急诊部(ED)对灾害应对设备、准备工作及培训进行了修订。然而,当存在有毒威胁时,临床医生仍必须决定何时以及需要何种级别的个人防护。在这种情况下,如有可能,需要清晰、简单且可实现的方案。在澳大利亚境外发生化学生物或放射性事件后,目前的证据表明,最初接收患者的急诊部工作人员佩戴合适的P2(N95)口罩或其等效物,将能充分抵御所有已知的化学生物和放射性吸入性威胁。通过佩戴双层手套、一次性防液体工作服或隔离衣、眼部防护、外科口罩,理想情况下还有帽子和鞋套,并结合通用预防措施和程序,可防止严重的接触性损伤。