Berger Nicolas J A, Jones Andrew M
School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007 Jun;32(3):383-93. doi: 10.1139/H06-109.
Pulmonary O2 uptake kinetics during "step" exercise have not been characterized in young, sprint-trained (SPT), athletes. Therefore, the objective of this study was to test the hypotheses that SPT athletes would have (i) slower phase II kinetics and (ii) a greater oxygen uptake "slow component" when compared with endurance-trained (ENT) athletes. Eight sub-elite SPT athletes (mean (+/-SD) age=25 (+/-7) y; mass=80.3 (+/-7.3) kg) and 8 sub-elite ENT athletes (age=28 (+/-4) y; mass=73.2 (+/-5.1) kg) completed a ramp incremental cycle ergometer test, a Wingate 30 s anaerobic sprint test, and repeat "step" transitions in work rate from 20 W to moderate- and severe-intensity cycle exercise, during which pulmonary oxygen uptake was measured breath by breath. The phase II oxygen uptake kinetics were significantly slower in the SPT athletes both for moderate (time constant, tau; SPT 32 (+/-4) s vs. ENT 17 (+/-3) s; p<0.01) and severe (SPT 32 (+/-12) s vs. ENT 20 (+/-6) s; p<0.05) exercise. The amplitude of the slow component (derived by exponential modelling) was not significantly different between the groups (SPT 0.55 (+/-0.12) L.min(-1) vs. ENT 0.50 (+/-0.22) L.min(-1)), but the increase in oxygen uptake between 3 and 6 min of severe exercise was greater in the SPT athletes (SPT 0.37 (+/-0.08) L.min(-1) vs. ENT 0.20 (+/-0.09) L.min(-1); p<0.01). The phase II tau was significantly correlated with indices of aerobic exercise performance (e.g., peak oxygen uptake (moderate-intensity r=-0.88, p<0.01; severe intensity r=-0.62; p<0.05), whereas the relative amplitude of the oxygen uptake slow component was significantly correlated with indices of anaerobic exercise performance (e.g., Wingate peak power output; r=0.77; p<0.01). Thus, it could be concluded that sub-elite SPT athletes have slower phase II oxygen uptake kinetics and a larger oxygen uptake slow component compared with sub-elite ENT athletes. It appears that indices of aerobic and anaerobic exercise performance differentially influence the fundamental and slow components of the oxygen uptake kinetics.
在“阶梯式”运动期间,年轻的短跑训练(SPT)运动员的肺氧摄取动力学尚未得到明确描述。因此,本研究的目的是检验以下假设:与耐力训练(ENT)运动员相比,SPT运动员(i)第二阶段动力学较慢,(ii)氧摄取“慢成分”更大。八名次精英SPT运动员(平均(±标准差)年龄=25(±7)岁;体重=80.3(±7.3)千克)和八名次精英ENT运动员(年龄=28(±4)岁;体重=73.2(±5.1)千克)完成了递增斜坡式自行车测力计测试、30秒温盖特无氧冲刺测试,以及从20瓦到中等强度和高强度自行车运动的工作率重复“阶梯式”转换,在此期间逐次测量肺氧摄取。在中等强度(时间常数,τ;SPT为32(±4)秒,ENT为17(±3)秒;p<0.01)和高强度(SPT为32(±12)秒,ENT为20(±6)秒;p<0.05)运动中,SPT运动员的第二阶段氧摄取动力学均显著较慢。两组之间慢成分的幅度(通过指数模型得出)无显著差异(SPT为0.55(±0.12)升·分钟⁻¹,ENT为0.50(±0.22)升·分钟⁻¹),但在高强度运动3至6分钟期间,SPT运动员的氧摄取增加幅度更大(SPT为0.37(±0.08)升·分钟⁻¹,ENT为0.20(±0.09)升·分钟⁻¹;p<0.01)。第二阶段的τ与有氧运动表现指标显著相关(例如,峰值氧摄取(中等强度r=-0.88,p<0.01;高强度r=-0.62;p<0.05),而氧摄取慢成分的相对幅度与无氧运动表现指标显著相关(例如,温盖特峰值功率输出;r=0.77;p<0.01)。因此,可以得出结论,与次精英ENT运动员相比,次精英SPT运动员具有较慢的第二阶段氧摄取动力学和较大的氧摄取慢成分。有氧运动和无氧运动表现指标似乎对氧摄取动力学的基本成分和慢成分有不同影响。