Glasgow Russell E, Nelson Candace C, Kearney Kathleen A, Reid Robert, Ritzwoller Debra P, Strecher Victor J, Couper Mick P, Green Beverly, Wildenhaus Kevin
Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
J Med Internet Res. 2007 May 9;9(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e11.
Research increasingly supports the conclusion that well-designed programs delivered over the Internet can produce significant weight loss compared to randomized controlled conditions. Much less is known about four important issues addressed in this study: (1) which recruitment methods produce higher eHealth participation rates, (2) which patient characteristics are related to enrollment, (3) which characteristics are related to level of user engagement in the program, and (4) which characteristics are related to continued participation in project assessments.
We recruited overweight members of three health maintenance organizations (HMOs) to participate in an entirely Internet-mediated weight loss program developed by HealthMedia, Inc. Two different recruitment methods were used: personal letters from prevention directors in each HMO, and general notices in member newsletters. The personal letters were sent to members diagnosed with diabetes or heart disease and, in one HMO, to a general membership sample in a particular geographic location. Data were collected in the context of a 2x2 randomized controlled trial, with participants assigned to receive or not receive a goal setting intervention and a nutrition education intervention in addition to the basic program.
A total of 2311 members enrolled. Bivariate analyses on aggregate data revealed that personalized mailings produced higher enrollment rates than member newsletters and that members with diabetes or heart disease were more likely to enroll than those without these diagnoses. In addition, males, those over age 60, smokers, and those estimated to have higher medical expenses were less likely to enroll (all P < .001). Males and those in the combined intervention were less likely to engage initially, or to continue to be engaged with their Web program, than other participants. In terms of retention, multiple logistic regressions revealed that enrollees under age 60 (P < .001) and those with higher baseline self-efficacy were less likely to participate in the 12-month follow-up (P = .03), but with these exceptions, those participating were very similar to those not participating in the follow-up.
A single personalized mailing increases enrollment in Internet-based weight loss. eHealth programs offer great potential for recruiting large numbers of participants, but they may not reach those at highest risk. Patient characteristics related to each of these important factors may be different, and more comprehensive analyses of determinants of enrollment, engagement, and retention in eHealth programs are needed.
越来越多的研究支持这样的结论,即与随机对照条件相比,精心设计的互联网项目能够显著减轻体重。对于本研究中涉及的四个重要问题,我们了解得要少得多:(1)哪种招募方法能产生更高的电子健康参与率;(2)哪些患者特征与报名有关;(3)哪些特征与项目中的用户参与程度有关;(4)哪些特征与持续参与项目评估有关。
我们招募了三个健康维护组织(HMO)的超重成员,让他们参与由健康媒体公司开发的完全通过互联网进行的减肥项目。使用了两种不同的招募方法:每个HMO预防主任的私人信件,以及会员通讯中的一般通知。私人信件被发送给被诊断患有糖尿病或心脏病的成员,在一个HMO中,还发送给特定地理位置的普通会员样本。数据是在一个2×2随机对照试验的背景下收集的,参与者被分配接受或不接受目标设定干预和营养教育干预,此外还有基本项目。
共有2311名成员报名。对汇总数据的双变量分析显示,个性化邮件的报名率高于会员通讯,并且患有糖尿病或心脏病的成员比没有这些诊断的成员更有可能报名。此外,男性、60岁以上的人、吸烟者以及预计医疗费用较高的人报名的可能性较小(所有P < 0.001)。与其他参与者相比,男性和接受联合干预的人最初参与或继续参与其网络项目的可能性较小。在留存率方面,多项逻辑回归显示,60岁以下的报名者(P < 0.001)和基线自我效能较高的人参与12个月随访的可能性较小(P = 0.03),但除了这些例外情况,参与随访的人与未参与随访的人非常相似。
单次个性化邮件可提高基于互联网的减肥项目的报名率。电子健康项目在招募大量参与者方面具有巨大潜力,但它们可能无法覆盖风险最高的人群。与这些重要因素中的每一个相关的患者特征可能不同,因此需要对电子健康项目中报名、参与和留存的决定因素进行更全面的分析。