Suppr超能文献

撤回:结直肠癌肝转移的手术切除与不干预或其他手术干预的比较

WITHDRAWN: Resection versus no intervention or other surgical interventions for colorectal cancer liver metastases.

作者信息

Al-asfoor A, Fedorowicz Z

机构信息

Salmaniyah Medical Complex, The Ministry of Health, Box 12, Manama, Bahrain.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD006039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006039.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

About one in four of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have metastases isolated to the liver, of which 10-25% are eligible for ablation of the liver metastases, improving the 5-year survival rate. Treatments include hepatic resection and non-surgical tumor ablation using cryosurgery and radiofrequency thermal ablation. Although new modalities allow safe ablation of liver metastases without the need for surgical intervention, there are still no clear guidelines on the appropriate management of patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic metastases.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives were to compare resection of liver metastases to no intervention and other modalities of intervention (including cryosurgery and radiofrequency ablation), in terms of the benefits and harms for each intervention.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified randomized controlled trials from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to October 2006, based upon the search strategy developed for MEDLINE, and revised appropriately for each database. In addition, references were scrutinized in identified eligible trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We only considered randomized controlled trials reporting patients of any age and sex, who have had curative surgery for adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, diagnosed with liver metastases that are candidates for liver resection, i.e., with no evidence of primary or metastatic cancer elsewhere.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality using a data-extraction form designed for this review. Discrepancies were resolved in consensus.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one trial fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The data of this 10-year prospective, randomized clinical trial suggest that hepatic cryosurgery is effective in the treatment of resectable and non-resectable liver metastases. The results show intra-operative tumor reduction (> or = 90% < or = 97%) and extended higher survival in these patients. The study indicated a 5-year and 10-year survival rate of 44% and 19% after cryosurgery, respectively. However, it was not possible to separate out and unravel the outcomes data that related only to the participants (66.6%) with liver metastases from colorectal cancer as opposed to those with liver metastases from other primary tumors.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to support a single approach, either surgical or non-surgical for the management of colorectal liver metastases. Therefore, treatment decisions should continue to be based on individual circumstances and clinician's experience. We concede that local ablative therapies are probably useful, but they need to be further evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

摘要

背景

大约四分之一的转移性结直肠癌患者的转移灶仅局限于肝脏,其中10%-25%的患者适合进行肝转移灶消融,这可提高5年生存率。治疗方法包括肝切除术以及使用冷冻手术和射频热消融的非手术肿瘤消融。尽管新的治疗方式允许在无需手术干预的情况下安全地消融肝转移灶,但对于结直肠癌合并肝转移患者的恰当管理仍没有明确的指南。

目的

主要目的是比较肝转移灶切除术与不干预以及其他干预方式(包括冷冻手术和射频消融)在每种干预措施的获益和危害方面的差异。

检索策略

我们根据为MEDLINE制定并针对每个数据库适当修订的检索策略,从MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane对照试验注册库中检索截至2006年10月的随机对照试验。此外,对已识别的符合条件的试验中的参考文献进行了仔细审查。

选择标准

我们仅考虑报告了任何年龄和性别的患者的随机对照试验,这些患者已接受结肠癌或直肠癌腺癌的根治性手术,被诊断为肝转移且适合进行肝切除术,即没有其他部位原发性或转移性癌症的证据。

数据收集与分析

两名评价员独立提取数据,并使用为本评价设计的数据提取表评估试验质量。分歧通过协商解决。

主要结果

仅有一项试验符合我们的纳入标准。这项为期10年的前瞻性随机临床试验的数据表明,肝脏冷冻手术在治疗可切除和不可切除的肝转移灶方面是有效的。结果显示术中肿瘤缩小(≥90%≤97%),并且这些患者的生存期延长。该研究表明冷冻手术后5年和10年生存率分别为44%和19%。然而,无法区分和梳理仅与结直肠癌肝转移患者(66.6%)相关的结局数据,而不是与其他原发性肿瘤肝转移患者相关的结局数据。

作者结论

目前没有足够的证据支持采用单一的手术或非手术方法来管理结直肠癌肝转移。因此,治疗决策应继续基于个体情况和临床医生的经验。我们承认局部消融疗法可能是有用的,但它们需要在随机对照试验中进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验