Suppr超能文献

多奈哌齐治疗癌症疲劳:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

Donepezil for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Bruera Eduardo, El Osta Badi, Valero Vicente, Driver Larry C, Pei Be-Lian, Shen Loren, Poulter Valerie A, Palmer J Lynn

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, Unit 008, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 10;25(23):3475-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.9231.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of donepezil compared with placebo in cancer patients with fatigue as measured by the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with fatigue score >or= 4 on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = no fatigue, 10 = worst possible fatigue) for more than 1 week were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive donepezil 5 mg or placebo orally every morning for 7 days. A research nurse contacted the patients by telephone daily to assess toxicity and fatigue level. All patients were offered open-label donepezil during the second week. FACIT-F and/or the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were assessed at baseline, and days 8, 11, and 15. The FACIT-F fatigue subscale score on day 8 was considered the primary end point.

RESULTS

Of 142 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 47 patients in the donepezil group and 56 in the placebo group were assessable for final analysis. Fatigue intensity improved significantly on day 8 in both donepezil and placebo groups. However, there was no significant difference in fatigue improvement by FACIT-F (P = .57) or ESAS (P = .18) between groups. In the open-label phase, fatigue intensity continued to be low as compared with baseline. No significant toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSION

Donepezil was not significantly superior to placebo in the treatment of cancer-related fatigue.

摘要

目的

通过慢性病治疗功能评估-疲劳量表(FACIT-F)评估多奈哌齐与安慰剂相比对癌症疲劳患者的有效性。

患者与方法

纳入在0至10分(0 = 无疲劳,10 = 可能的最严重疲劳)量表上疲劳评分≥4分且持续超过1周的患者。患者被随机分配,每天早晨口服5毫克多奈哌齐或安慰剂,共7天。研究护士每天通过电话联系患者,评估毒性和疲劳水平。在第二周,所有患者都可使用开放标签的多奈哌齐。在基线、第8天、第11天和第15天评估FACIT-F和/或埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS)。第8天的FACIT-F疲劳子量表评分被视为主要终点。

结果

在随机分配接受治疗的142例患者中,多奈哌齐组47例患者和安慰剂组56例患者可进行最终分析。多奈哌齐组和安慰剂组在第8天疲劳强度均有显著改善。然而,两组之间在FACIT-F(P = 0.57)或ESAS(P = 0.18)评估的疲劳改善方面无显著差异。在开放标签阶段,与基线相比,疲劳强度持续较低。未观察到显著毒性。

结论

在治疗癌症相关疲劳方面,多奈哌齐并不显著优于安慰剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验