Bridges Ana J, Holler Karen A
Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Child Neuropsychol. 2007 Nov;13(6):528-38. doi: 10.1080/09297040701233875.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine how confidence intervals (CIs) for pediatric neuropsychological norms vary as a function of sample size, and to determine optimal sample sizes for normative studies. First, the authors calculated 95% CIs for a set of published pediatric norms for four commonly used neuropsychological instruments. Second, 95% CIs were calculated for varying sample size (from n = 5 to n = 500). Results suggest that some pediatric norms have unacceptably wide CIs, and normative studies ought optimally to use 50 to 75 participants per cell. Smaller sample sizes may lead to overpathologizing results, while the cost of obtaining larger samples may not be justifiable.
本研究的目的是确定儿童神经心理学常模的置信区间(CI)如何随样本量变化,并确定规范性研究的最佳样本量。首先,作者计算了四种常用神经心理学工具的一组已发表儿童常模的95%置信区间。其次,针对不同样本量(从n = 5到n = 500)计算了95%置信区间。结果表明,一些儿童常模的置信区间宽得令人无法接受,规范性研究每个单元格最佳应使用50至75名参与者。样本量较小可能导致结果过度病态化,而获取更大样本的成本可能不合理。