Konrad Gerald, Katz Alan
Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Jun;53(6):1055, 2001:e.1-6, 1054.
To determine the difference in outcomes between universal screening and risk-based assessment for prenatal group B streptococcus (GBS) infection based on the epidemiology of early-onset GBS infection in Winnipeg, Man, and to examine its implications for prenatal GBS screening.
Retrospective random chart audit of 330 women receiving intrapartum hospital care and retrospective chart audit of all infants with early-onset neonatal GBS disease over 2 years.
Each of the 3 hospitals in Winnipeg, Man, offering intrapartum services.
Maternal charts were audited for history of prenatal GBS screening, GBS status, clinical risk factors for neonatal GBS transmission, and use of intrapartum antibiotics to prevent neonatal GBS infection. Neonatal GBS records were audited for maternal clinical risk factors for GBS transmission, history of maternal GBS screening and GBS status, use of maternal intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, and neonatal outcome.
Screening revealed a 26% GBS carrier rate in our population. Among these carriers, 70% (or 18% of the population) had no other clinical risk factors for neonatal GBS transmission. The transmission rate for untreated GBS-positive women was 1.74 per 1000 women. The differences in outcomes between universal and risk-based screening were small in our population. A total of 3449 women would require universal screening to prevent a single case of early-onset neonatal GBS disease that would occur if a risk-based approach were used (3 cases per year). This number increases to 68,966 to prevent a single GBS-related death (1 case in 7 years). An additional 679 women would receive intrapartum prophylactic antibiotics per year with universal screening than would have received antibiotics with a risk-based approach.
The differences in neonatal GBS transmission rates resulting from universal versus risk-based screening in Winnipeg require universal screening of many women for results to become apparent. Universal screening and antibiotic prophylaxis of all GBS carriers result in increased antibiotic exposure in our population, which might carry its own risks. Therefore, patients should be involved in decisions on whether to be screened based on identification of risks and benefits.
根据加拿大曼尼托巴省温尼伯市早发型B族链球菌(GBS)感染的流行病学情况,确定普遍筛查和基于风险评估的产前GBS感染筛查在结果上的差异,并探讨其对产前GBS筛查的影响。
对330名接受产时住院护理的妇女进行回顾性随机图表审核,并对2年内所有早发型新生儿GBS疾病患儿进行回顾性图表审核。
加拿大曼尼托巴省温尼伯市提供产时服务的3家医院。
审核产妇病历,了解产前GBS筛查史、GBS状态、新生儿GBS传播的临床风险因素以及产时使用抗生素预防新生儿GBS感染的情况。审核新生儿GBS记录,了解产妇GBS传播的临床风险因素、产妇GBS筛查史和GBS状态、产妇产时抗生素预防的使用情况以及新生儿结局。
筛查显示我们研究人群中GBS携带率为26%。在这些携带者中,70%(即研究人群的18%)没有其他新生儿GBS传播的临床风险因素。未治疗的GBS阳性妇女的传播率为每1000名妇女中有1.74例。在我们的研究人群中,普遍筛查和基于风险的筛查在结果上的差异很小。如果采用基于风险的方法(每年3例),总共需要对3449名妇女进行普遍筛查,以预防1例早发型新生儿GBS疾病。为预防1例GBS相关死亡(7年1例),这个数字增加到68966。与基于风险的方法相比,普遍筛查每年将使另外679名妇女接受产时预防性抗生素治疗。
在温尼伯市,普遍筛查和基于风险的筛查导致的新生儿GBS传播率差异需要对许多妇女进行普遍筛查才能使结果显现出来。对所有GBS携带者进行普遍筛查和抗生素预防会导致我们研究人群中抗生素暴露增加,这可能会带来自身的风险。因此,应让患者参与基于风险和益处识别的筛查决策。