Suppr超能文献

加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE):解释与详述

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

作者信息

Vandenbroucke Jan P, von Elm Erik, Altman Douglas G, Gøtzsche Peter C, Mulrow Cynthia D, Pocock Stuart J, Poole Charles, Schlesselman James J, Egger Matthias

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511.

Abstract

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers.This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.

摘要

许多医学研究都是观察性的。观察性研究的报告质量往往不高。报告质量差会妨碍对研究优缺点及其结果可推广性的评估。考虑到实证证据和理论考量,一组方法学家、研究人员和编辑制定了《加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范》(STROBE)建议,以提高观察性研究的报告质量。STROBE声明包括一份由22项内容组成的清单,这些内容与文章的标题、摘要、引言、方法、结果和讨论部分相关。其中18项是队列研究、病例对照研究和横断面研究共有的,另外4项则分别针对这三种研究设计中的每一种。STROBE声明为作者提供了关于如何改进观察性研究报告的指导,并便于审稿人、期刊编辑和读者对研究进行批判性评价和解读。这份解释与阐述文件旨在加强STROBE声明的使用、理解和传播。文中介绍了每个清单项目的含义和基本原理。对于每个项目,都给出了一个或几个已发表的示例,并在可能的情况下提供了相关实证研究和方法学文献的参考文献。还包括有用的流程图示例。STROBE声明、本文档以及相关网站(http://www.strobe-statement.org)应成为提高观察性研究报告质量的有益资源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验