Suppr超能文献

预测婴儿百日咳

Predicting pertussis in infants.

作者信息

Guinto-Ocampo Hazel, Bennett Jonathan E, Attia Magdy W

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Medical College, A.I. duPont Hospital for Children, Nemours Children's Clinic, Wilmington, DE 19899, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Jan;24(1):16-20. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e31815f39b6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of reported cases of pertussis is increasing, despite high rates of vaccination among infants and children. The burden of disease, and rates of complication and death are highest among infants. The limited availability of a timely reliable confirmatory test for pertussis hinders early identification of infected infants.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective is to identify clinical and laboratory predictors for pertussis among infants.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from the medical records of all infants aged 12 months or younger who underwent confirmatory testing (culture, direct fluorescent assay, or polymerase chain reaction) for Bordetella pertussis from January 1, 2001, to July 31, 2005. The association of 15 variables with a positive pertussis test was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis, and when appropriate, using receiver operating characteristics.

RESULTS

We reviewed the medical records of 141 infants who were tested for pertussis. The mean age was 88 days, and the most common chief complaints were cough and breathing difficulty. Eighteen patients (13%) had a positive pertussis test, and 123 (87%) had a negative test. Bronchiolitis and upper respiratory tract infection were the most common discharge diagnoses among infants with a negative test. The 2 groups were similar with respect to sex, history of cough, vomiting, fever, symptoms of apparent life-threatening event, presence of fever, or hypoxia, and heart rate. Infants who were younger (55 days vs 93 days, P = 0.02), evaluated between July and October (23% vs 9%, P = 0.02), less tachypneic (39 breaths/min vs 47 breaths/min, P = 0.02), had higher white blood cell counts (20,000/microL vs 15,000/microL, P = 0.02), higher percentage of lymphocytes (72 vs 55, P = 0.00), and higher absolute lymphocyte counts ([ALC] 14,536/microL vs 8357/microL, P = 0.00) were more likely to have a positive test. Receiver operating characteristics for ALC demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.81, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.72 to 0.90. An ALC cutoff point of 9400 was determined to maximize sensitivity (89%) and specificity (75%). The negative predictive value of this cutoff point was 97%, and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.6, with a 95% confidence interval of 2.3 to 5.4.

CONCLUSIONS

Among infants who underwent confirmatory testing for pertussis, those who are younger, evaluated between July and October, less tachypneic, have higher white blood cell counts, higher percentage of lymphocytes, and higher ALCs are more likely to have a positive test. The ALC was the best predictor of pertussis, and an ALC of less than 9400/microL excluded almost all infants without pertussis.

摘要

背景

尽管婴幼儿疫苗接种率很高,但报告的百日咳病例发病率仍在上升。疾病负担以及并发症和死亡率在婴儿中最高。百日咳及时可靠的确诊检测方法有限,这阻碍了对受感染婴儿的早期识别。

目的

我们的目的是确定婴儿百日咳的临床和实验室预测因素。

方法

收集了2001年1月1日至2005年7月31日期间所有接受百日咳博德特氏菌确诊检测(培养、直接荧光检测或聚合酶链反应)的12个月及以下婴儿的病历中的人口统计学、临床和实验室数据。使用单变量和多变量分析,并在适当情况下使用受试者工作特征分析15个变量与百日咳检测阳性之间的关联。

结果

我们回顾了141名接受百日咳检测的婴儿的病历。平均年龄为88天,最常见的主要症状是咳嗽和呼吸困难。18名患者(13%)百日咳检测呈阳性,123名(87%)检测呈阴性。细支气管炎和上呼吸道感染是检测阴性婴儿中最常见的出院诊断。两组在性别、咳嗽史、呕吐、发热、明显危及生命事件的症状、发热或缺氧的存在以及心率方面相似。年龄较小(55天对93天,P = 0.02)、在7月至10月期间接受评估(23%对9%,P = 0.02)、呼吸频率较慢(39次/分钟对47次/分钟,P = 0.02)、白细胞计数较高(20,000/微升对15,000/微升,P = 0.02)、淋巴细胞百分比更高(72对55,P = 0.00)以及绝对淋巴细胞计数更高([ALC] 14,536/微升对8357/微升,P = 0.00)的婴儿检测呈阳性的可能性更大。ALC的受试者工作特征显示曲线下面积为0.81,95%置信区间为0.72至0.90。确定ALC临界值为9400以最大化敏感性(89%)和特异性(75%)。该临界值的阴性预测值为97%,阳性似然比为3.6,95%置信区间为2.3至5.4。

结论

在接受百日咳确诊检测的婴儿中,年龄较小、在7月至10月期间接受评估、呼吸频率较慢、白细胞计数较高、淋巴细胞百分比更高以及ALC更高的婴儿检测呈阳性的可能性更大。ALC是百日咳的最佳预测指标,ALC低于9400/微升几乎可排除所有无百日咳的婴儿。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验