Noble Meredith, Tregear Stephen J, Treadwell Jonathan R, Schoelles Karen
ECRI Institute, Evidence-Based Practice Center and Health Technology Assessment Group, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Feb;35(2):214-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.015. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
Opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is controversial due to concerns regarding long-term efficacy and adverse events (including addiction). We systematically reviewed the clinical evidence on patients treated with opioids for CNCP for at least six months. Of 115 studies identified by our search of eleven databases (through April 7, 2007), 17 studies (patients [n]=3,079) met inclusion criteria. Studies evaluated oral (studies [k]=7; n=1,504), transdermal (k=3; n=1, 993), and/or intrathecal (k=8; n=177) opioids. Many patients withdrew from the clinical trials due to adverse effects (oral: 32.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 26.1%-39.6%]; intrathecal: 6.3% [95% CI, 2.9%-13.1%]; transdermal: 17.5% [95% CI, 6.5%-39.0%]), or due to insufficient pain relief (oral: 11.9% [95% CI, 7.8%-17.7%]; intrathecal: 10.5% [95% CI, 3.5%-27.4%]; transdermal: 5.8% [95% CI, 4.2%-7.3%]). Signs of opioid addiction were reported in only 0.05% (1/2,042) of patients and abuse in only 0.43% (3/685). There was an insufficient amount of data on transdermal opioids to quantify pain relief. For patients able to remain on oral or intrathecal opioids for at least six months, pain scores were reduced long-term (oral: standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.99, 95% CI, 1.17-2.80; intrathecal: SMD 1.33, 95% CI, 0.97-1.69). We conclude that many patients discontinue long-term opioid therapy due to adverse events or insufficient pain relief; however, weak evidence suggests that oral and intrathecal opioids reduce pain long-term in the relatively small proportion of individuals with CNCP who continue treatment.
由于对长期疗效和不良事件(包括成瘾)的担忧,阿片类药物用于慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)的治疗存在争议。我们系统回顾了接受阿片类药物治疗CNCP至少六个月的患者的临床证据。在我们检索11个数据库(截至2007年4月7日)所确定的115项研究中,有17项研究(患者[n]=3079)符合纳入标准。这些研究评估了口服(研究[k]=7;n=1504)、透皮(k=3;n=1993)和/或鞘内(k=8;n=177)阿片类药物。许多患者因不良反应(口服:32.5%[95%置信区间(CI),26.1%-39.6%];鞘内:6.3%[95%CI,2.9%-13.1%];透皮:17.5%[95%CI,6.5%-39.0%])或止痛效果不佳(口服:11.9%[95%CI,7.8%-17.7%];鞘内:10.5%[95%CI,3.5%-