Suppr超能文献

度洛西汀每日一次60毫克用于老年重度抑郁症患者的安全性和耐受性。

Safety and tolerability of duloxetine at 60 mg once daily in elderly patients with major depressive disorder.

作者信息

Raskin Joel, Wiltse Curtis G, Dinkel James J, Walker Daniel J, Desaiah Durisala, Katona Cornelius

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Feb;28(1):32-8. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e318160738e.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and tolerability profile of duloxetine versus placebo in elderly (> or = 65 years) patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

Patients were randomized (2:1) to duloxetine 60 mg/d (once daily) (n = 207) or placebo (n = 104) for 8 weeks. Safety and tolerability measures were analyzed in the total cohort of patients, as well as in subgroups defined by age and preexisting hypertension.

RESULTS

Patients had a median age of 72 years (65-90 years). No deaths occurred in the study. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were similar for duloxetine and placebo (9.7% vs 8.7%). Treatment-emergent dry mouth, nausea, and diarrhea occurred significantly (P < or = 0.05) more frequently with duloxetine compared with placebo. Changes in supine and standing blood pressure (BP) and pulse and in corrected QT (QTc) interval were not significantly different between duloxetine and placebo, except for change in orthostatic systolic BP (-2.45 vs 0.93 mm Hg; P = .017). Incidences of sustained elevation in BP and treatment-emergent orthostatic hypotension were similar for duloxetine compared with placebo (0.5% vs 1.0% and 15.6% vs 20.5%, respectively). The duloxetine group showed significant weight loss compared with the placebo group (-0.73 kg vs -0.13 kg; P = 0.009). Of 5 hepatic analytes, the only significant difference was an increase in alkaline phosphatase in duloxetine compared with placebo (P = 0.017); this difference was not considered clinically relevant. The incidence of 1 or more discontinuation-emergent adverse events was not significantly different between the duloxetine and placebo groups (17.3% vs 11.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that duloxetine is safe and well tolerated in elderly patients with major depressive disorder.

摘要

目的

比较度洛西汀与安慰剂在老年(≥65岁)重度抑郁症(MDD)患者中的安全性和耐受性。

方法

患者按2:1随机分组,接受度洛西汀60mg/天(每日一次)(n = 207)或安慰剂(n = 104)治疗8周。对全部患者队列以及按年龄和既往高血压定义的亚组进行安全性和耐受性分析。

结果

患者中位年龄为72岁(65 - 90岁)。研究中无死亡病例。度洛西汀和安慰剂因不良事件导致的停药率相似(9.7%对8.7%)。与安慰剂相比,度洛西汀治疗期间出现口干、恶心和腹泻的频率显著更高(P≤0.05)。度洛西汀和安慰剂之间仰卧位和站立位血压(BP)、脉搏以及校正QT(QTc)间期的变化无显著差异,但体位性收缩压变化除外(-2.45对0.93mmHg;P = 0.017)。度洛西汀与安慰剂相比,血压持续升高和治疗期间出现体位性低血压的发生率相似(分别为0.5%对1.0%和15.6%对20.5%)。与安慰剂组相比,度洛西汀组体重显著减轻(-0.73kg对-0.13kg;P = 0.009)。在5种肝脏分析物中,唯一显著差异是度洛西汀组碱性磷酸酶较安慰剂组升高(P = 0.017);但该差异不被认为具有临床相关性。度洛西汀组和安慰剂组出现1种或更多停药后不良事件的发生率无显著差异(17.3%对11.3%)。

结论

本研究表明度洛西汀在老年重度抑郁症患者中安全且耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验