Penesis Vince A, Fitzgerald Patrick I, Fayad Mohamed I, Wenckus Christopher S, BeGole Ellen A, Johnson Bradford R
Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Endod. 2008 Mar;34(3):251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.015.
The choice of one-visit versus two-visit root canal therapy for necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis is a source of current debate. The primary objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare radiographic evidence of periapical healing after root canal therapy completed in one visit or two visits with an interim calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine paste dressing. Ninety-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the one-visit or two-visit group, and root canal therapy was performed with a standardized protocol. Patients in the two-visit group received an intracanal dressing of calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine paste. Sixty-three patients, 33 in the one-visit group and 30 in the two-visit group, were evaluated at 12 months. The primary outcome measure was change in apical bone density by using the periapical index (PAI). Secondary outcome measures were proportion of teeth healed or improved in each group. Both groups exhibited equally favorable periapical healing at 12 months, with no statistically significant differences between groups.
对于患有根尖周炎的坏死牙齿,选择一次就诊还是两次就诊的根管治疗是当前争论的一个焦点。这项随机对照临床试验的主要目的是比较在一次就诊或两次就诊并使用氢氧化钙/氯己定糊剂进行临时敷料的情况下,根管治疗后根尖愈合的影像学证据。97名患者符合纳入标准并同意参与本研究。患者被随机分配到一次就诊组或两次就诊组,并按照标准化方案进行根管治疗。两次就诊组的患者接受了氢氧化钙/氯己定糊剂的根管内敷料。在12个月时对63名患者进行了评估,其中一次就诊组33名,两次就诊组30名。主要结局指标是使用根尖指数(PAI)评估根尖骨密度的变化。次要结局指标是每组中愈合或改善的牙齿比例。两组在12个月时均表现出同样良好的根尖愈合情况,组间差异无统计学意义。