Suppr超能文献

在接受过非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂治疗的激素受体阳性晚期绝经后乳腺癌女性中,氟维司群与依西美坦对比的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验:EFECT研究结果

Double-blind, randomized placebo controlled trial of fulvestrant compared with exemestane after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: results from EFECT.

作者信息

Chia Stephen, Gradishar William, Mauriac Louis, Bines Jose, Amant Frederic, Federico Miriam, Fein Luis, Romieu Gilles, Buzdar Aman, Robertson John F R, Brufsky Adam, Possinger Kurt, Rennie Pamela, Sapunar Francisco, Lowe Elizabeth, Piccart Martine

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, 600 West 10 Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1664-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5822. Epub 2008 Mar 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The third-generation nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are increasingly used as adjuvant and first-line advanced therapy for postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Because many patients subsequently experience progression or relapse, it is important to identify agents with efficacy after AI failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation of Faslodex versus Exemestane Clinical Trial (EFECT) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter phase III trial of fulvestrant versus exemestane in postmenopausal women with HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) progressing or recurring after nonsteroidal AI. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). A fulvestrant loading-dose (LD) regimen was used: 500 mg intramuscularly on day 0, 250 mg on days 14, 28, and 250 mg every 28 days thereafter. Exemestane 25 mg orally was administered once daily.

RESULTS

A total of 693 women were randomly assigned to fulvestrant (n = 351) or exemestane (n = 342). Approximately 60% of patients had received at least two prior endocrine therapies. Median TTP was 3.7 months in both groups (hazard ratio = 0.963; 95% CI, 0.819 to 1.133; P = .6531). The overall response rate (7.4% v 6.7%; P = .736) and clinical benefit rate (32.2% v 31.5%; P = .853) were similar between fulvestrant and exemestane respectively. Median duration of clinical benefit was 9.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated, with no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events or quality of life. Pharmacokinetic data confirm that steady-state was reached within 1 month with the LD schedule of fulvestrant.

CONCLUSION

Fulvestrant LD and exemestane are equally active and well-tolerated in a meaningful proportion of postmenopausal women with ABC who have experienced progression or recurrence during treatment with a nonsteroidal AI.

摘要

目的

第三代非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)越来越多地被用作绝经后激素受体阳性(HR+)乳腺癌的辅助治疗和一线晚期治疗。由于许多患者随后会出现疾病进展或复发,因此识别在AI治疗失败后仍有效的药物非常重要。

材料与方法

Faslodex与依西美坦临床试验(EFECT)是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心III期试验,在非甾体AI治疗后进展或复发的绝经后HR+晚期乳腺癌(ABC)女性中比较氟维司群与依西美坦。主要终点是疾病进展时间(TTP)。采用氟维司群负荷剂量(LD)方案:第0天肌肉注射500mg,第14天、28天各注射250mg,此后每28天注射250mg。依西美坦25mg口服,每日一次。

结果

共有693名女性被随机分配至氟维司群组(n = 351)或依西美坦组(n = 342)。约60%的患者既往至少接受过两种内分泌治疗。两组的中位TTP均为3.7个月(风险比 = 0.963;95%CI,0.819至1.133;P = 0.6531)。氟维司群和依西美坦的总体缓解率(分别为7.4%对6.7%;P = 0.736)和临床获益率(分别为32.2%对31.5%;P = 0.853)相似。临床获益的中位持续时间分别为9.3个月和8.3个月。两种治疗的耐受性均良好,不良事件发生率和生活质量无显著差异。药代动力学数据证实,氟维司群LD方案在1个月内达到稳态。

结论

对于在非甾体AI治疗期间出现进展或复发的绝经后ABC女性,氟维司群LD方案和依西美坦具有同等活性且耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验