Kopp Matthias Volkmar, Hennemuth Isabell, Heinzmann Andrea, Urbanek Radvan
University Children's Hospital, Mathildenstrasse 1, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):e850-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1492. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
The value of probiotics for primary prevention is controversial. Published trials vary considerably in study design and the applied probiotics, thereby limiting comparability of the results.
The purpose of this trial was to study the preventive effect of the probiotic Lactobacillus GG on the development of atopic dermatitis.
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective trial, 105 pregnant women from families with > or = 1 member (mother, father, or child) with an atopic disease were randomly assigned to receive either the probiotic Lactobacillus GG (American Type Culture Collection 53103; 5 x 10(9) colony-forming units of Lactobacillus GG twice daily) or placebo. Ninety-four families (89.5%) completed the trial. The supplementation period started 4 to 6 weeks before expected delivery, followed by a postnatal period of 6 months. The primary end point was the occurrence of atopic dermatitis at the age of 2 years. Secondary outcomes were severity of atopic dermatitis, recurrent episodes of wheezing bronchitis, and allergic sensitization at the age of 2 years.
Atopic dermatitis was diagnosed in 14 (28%) of 50 in the Lactobacillus GG group and in 12 (27.3%) of 44 in the placebo group. The risk of atopic dermatitis in children on probiotics relative to placebo was 0.96 (confidence interval 0.38-2.33). Severity of atopic dermatitis was comparable between the 2 groups. Notably, children with recurrent (> or = 5) episodes of wheezing bronchitis were more frequent in the Lactobacillus GG group (26%; n = 13), as compared with the placebo group (9.1%; n = 4). No difference was observed between both groups in total immunoglobulin E concentrations or numbers of specific sensitization to inhalant allergens.
Supplementation with Lactobacillus GG during pregnancy and early infancy neither reduced the incidence of atopic dermatitis nor altered the severity of atopic dermatitis in affected children but was associated with an increased rate of recurrent episodes of wheezing bronchitis. Therefore, Lactobacillus GG cannot be generally recommended for primary prevention.
益生菌用于一级预防的价值存在争议。已发表的试验在研究设计和所应用的益生菌方面差异很大,从而限制了结果的可比性。
本试验旨在研究益生菌鼠李糖乳杆菌GG对特应性皮炎发生的预防作用。
在一项双盲、安慰剂对照的前瞻性试验中,105名来自有≥1名成员(母亲、父亲或孩子)患有特应性疾病家庭的孕妇被随机分配接受益生菌鼠李糖乳杆菌GG(美国典型培养物保藏中心53103;5×10⁹菌落形成单位的鼠李糖乳杆菌GG,每日两次)或安慰剂。94个家庭(89.5%)完成了试验。补充期在预期分娩前4至6周开始,随后是6个月的产后阶段。主要终点是2岁时特应性皮炎的发生情况。次要结局是特应性皮炎的严重程度、喘息性支气管炎的复发次数以及2岁时的过敏致敏情况。
鼠李糖乳杆菌GG组50名儿童中有14名(28%)被诊断为特应性皮炎,安慰剂组44名儿童中有12名(27.3%)被诊断为特应性皮炎。服用益生菌的儿童患特应性皮炎的风险相对于安慰剂为0.96(置信区间0.38 - 2.33)。两组特应性皮炎的严重程度相当。值得注意的是,与安慰剂组(9.1%;n = 4)相比,鼠李糖乳杆菌GG组中喘息性支气管炎复发(≥5次)发作的儿童更常见(26%;n = 13)。两组在总免疫球蛋白E浓度或对吸入性过敏原的特异性致敏数量方面未观察到差异。
孕期和婴儿早期补充鼠李糖乳杆菌GG既未降低特应性皮炎的发病率,也未改变患病儿童特应性皮炎的严重程度,但与喘息性支气管炎复发率增加有关。因此,一般不推荐使用鼠李糖乳杆菌GG进行一级预防。