Tae Woo Suk, Kim Sam Soo, Lee Kang Uk, Nam Eui-Cheol, Kim Keun Woo
Neuroscience Research Institute, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Kangwon, Korea.
Neuroradiology. 2008 Jul;50(7):569-81. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0383-9. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
To validate the usefulness of the packages available for automated hippocampal volumetry, we measured hippocampal volumes using one manual and two recently developed automated volumetric methods.
The study included T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 21 patients with chronic major depressive disorder (MDD) and 20 normal controls. Using coronal turbo field echo (TFE) MRI with a slice thickness of 1.3 mm, the hippocampal volumes were measured using three methods: manual volumetry, surface-based parcellation using FreeSurfer, and individual atlas-based volumetry using IBASPM. In addition, the intracranial cavity volume (ICV) was measured manually.
The absolute left hippocampal volume of the patients with MDD measured using all three methods was significantly smaller than the left hippocampal volume of the normal controls (manual P = 0.029, FreeSurfer P = 0.035, IBASPM P = 0.018). After controlling for the ICV, except for the right hippocampal volume measured using FreeSurfer, both measured hippocampal volumes of the patients with MDD were significantly smaller than the measured hippocampal volumes of the normal controls (right manual P = 0.019, IBASPM P = 0.012; left manual P = 0.003, FreeSurfer P = 0.010, IBASPM P = 0.002),. In the intrarater reliability test, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were all excellent (manual right 0.947, left 0.934; FreeSurfer right 1.000, left 1.000; IBASPM right 1.000, left 1.000). In the test of agreement between the volumetric methods, the ICCs were right 0.846 and left 0.848 (manual and FreeSurfer), and right 0.654 and left 0.717 (manual and IBASPM).
The automated hippocampal volumetric methods showed good agreement with manual hippocampal volumetry, but the volume measured using FreeSurfer was 35% larger and the agreement was questionable with IBASPM. Although the automated methods could detect hippocampal atrophy in the patients with MDD, the results indicate that manual hippocampal volumetry is still the gold standard, while the automated volumetric methods need to be improved.
为验证现有的用于自动海马体积测量的软件包的实用性,我们使用一种手动方法和两种最近开发的自动体积测量方法测量了海马体积。
该研究纳入了21例慢性重度抑郁症(MDD)患者和20名正常对照者的T1加权磁共振成像(MRI)。使用层厚为1.3 mm的冠状面快速场回波(TFE)MRI,采用三种方法测量海马体积:手动体积测量法、使用FreeSurfer基于表面的脑区划分法以及使用IBASPM基于个体图谱的体积测量法。此外,手动测量颅腔体积(ICV)。
使用所有三种方法测量的MDD患者的左侧海马绝对体积均显著小于正常对照者的左侧海马体积(手动测量P = 0.029,FreeSurfer法P = 0.035,IBASPM法P = 0.018)。在控制ICV后,除了使用FreeSurfer法测量的右侧海马体积外,MDD患者测量的双侧海马体积均显著小于正常对照者测量的海马体积(右侧手动测量P = 0.019,IBASPM法P = 0.012;左侧手动测量P = 0.003,FreeSurfer法P = 0.010,IBASPM法P = 0.002)。在同一评估者可靠性测试中,组内相关系数(ICC)均极佳(手动测量右侧0.947,左侧0.934;FreeSurfer法右侧1.000,左侧1.000;IBASPM法右侧1.000,左侧1.000)。在体积测量方法之间的一致性测试中,ICC分别为右侧0.846和左侧0.848(手动测量与FreeSurfer法),以及右侧0.654和左侧0.717(手动测量与IBASPM法)。
自动海马体积测量方法与手动海马体积测量法显示出良好的一致性,但使用FreeSurfer法测量的体积比实际大35%,且与IBASPM法的一致性存疑。虽然自动方法能够检测出MDD患者的海马萎缩,但结果表明手动海马体积测量法仍是金标准,而自动体积测量方法需要改进。