Suppr超能文献

安非他酮缓释片与文拉法辛缓释片抗抑郁疗效及耐受性的为期八周的安慰剂对照双盲比较

Eight-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR.

作者信息

Hewett K, Chrzanowski W, Schmitz M, Savela A, Milanova V, Gee M, Krishen A, Millen L, Leary M O, Modell J

机构信息

GlaxoSmithKline, New Frontier Science Park, Harlow, UK.

出版信息

J Psychopharmacol. 2009 Jul;23(5):531-8. doi: 10.1177/0269881108089602. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

Abstract

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR was assessed and compared with placebo in adult outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Adults meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD with a minimum Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) 17-Item total score of > or =18 were randomized to eight weeks of double-blind treatment with either bupropion XR (150 mg/day), venlafaxine XR (75 mg/day) or placebo. At the end of the fourth week of treatment, a dosage increase to bupropion XR 300 mg/day or venlafaxine XR 150 mg/day was allowed if, in the opinion of the investigator, response was inadequate. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline at week 8 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score last observation carried forward (LOCF). Mean changes from baseline at week 8 (LOCF) in MADRS total score were statistically significant for bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR patients compared to the placebo group: -16.0 for bupropion XR (P = 0.006 vs placebo), -17.1 for venlafaxine XR (P < 0.001 vs placebo) and -13.5 for placebo. Secondary outcomes (including CGI-S, HAM-A, MEI, Q-LES-Q-SF, responder and remitter analyses) also improved significantly for both active treatment groups compared with placebo. The most frequently reported adverse events were dry mouth and insomnia for bupropion XR, and nausea, hyperhidrosis, fatigue, and insomnia for venlafaxine XR. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, bupropion XR at doses up to 300 mg/day and venlafaxine XR at doses up to 150 mg/day demonstrated comparable antidepressant efficacy.

摘要

评估了安非他酮缓释片和文拉法辛缓释片在患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的成年门诊患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性,并与安慰剂进行了比较。符合DSM-IV标准的MDD成年患者,汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)17项总分≥18分,被随机分配接受为期8周的双盲治疗,治疗药物为安非他酮缓释片(150毫克/天)、文拉法辛缓释片(75毫克/天)或安慰剂。在治疗的第四周结束时,如果研究者认为反应不充分,允许将安非他酮缓释片剂量增加至300毫克/天或文拉法辛缓释片剂量增加至150毫克/天。主要疗效终点是第8周时蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)总分较基线的平均变化,采用末次观察结转(LOCF)法。与安慰剂组相比,安非他酮缓释片和文拉法辛缓释片治疗的患者在第8周(LOCF)时MADRS总分较基线的平均变化具有统计学意义:安非他酮缓释片为-16.0(与安慰剂相比,P = 0.006),文拉法辛缓释片为-17.1(与安慰剂相比,P < 0.001),安慰剂为-13.5。与安慰剂相比,两个活性治疗组的次要结局(包括CGI-S、HAM-A、MEI、Q-LES-Q-SF、有效者和缓解者分析)也有显著改善。最常报告的不良事件是安非他酮缓释片导致的口干和失眠,以及文拉法辛缓释片导致的恶心、多汗、疲劳和失眠。在这项双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,剂量高达300毫克/天的安非他酮缓释片和剂量高达150毫克/天的文拉法辛缓释片显示出相当的抗抑郁疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验