Stoner Steven C, Deal Eli, Lurk Jason T
Division of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1507-10. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L239. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
To report the development of neutropenia in a patient after almost 8 years of being stabilized on delayed-release divalproex sodium (DVPX).
A 45-year-old man had been maintained on DVPX for nearly 8 years, with serum valproic acid concentrations of 85-128 mg/L and normal white blood cell (WBC) counts and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs). Five months prior to the development of neutropenia (defined as ANC <1800 cells/microL), the patient's DVPX dosage was decreased by 250 mg to 1250 mg every morning and 1500 mg every evening. After 2 months of that regimen, the DVPX dosage was increased back to 1500 mg twice daily. Three months after that increase, the patient's WBC count dropped to 3.7 x 10(3)/microL and ANC was 1199 cells/microL. Although the ANC was below 1800 cells/microL, he showed no physical manifestations consistent with neutropenia. DVPX was discontinued, and 2 weeks later the patient's WBC count was 7.2 x 10(3)/microL and ANC was 2290 cells/microL.
Although a complete blood cell count with differential is a commonly accepted form of therapeutic drug monitoring with DVPX, the monitoring is considered most necessary to identify dose-related thrombocytopenia. However, neutropenia has been rarely associated with the use of DVPX and could contribute to the development of different types of infection, including those of a bacterial, viral, or fungal origin. Although neutropenia is generally mild in severity, potentially severe DVPX-associated neutropenia can occur any time during the course of therapy, although it is most common within the first few months of treatment. In this case, DVPX was the probable cause of the neutropenia, according to the Naranjo probability scale. However, this case of neutropenia is atypical with respect to the timeframe in which it developed and was identified. Although the documented laboratory findings suggest neutropenia, the patient did not experience any clinical complications as a result. The late onset of the patient's neutropenia is unlike other cases that have been documented in the literature.
Hematologic therapeutic drug monitoring continues to be clinically important regardless of whether the patient is early in therapy or even years later in the course. In this patient, continued regular therapeutic drug monitoring identified a suspected drug-related complication and the medication was able to be discontinued without the development of clinical complications.
报告一名患者在服用缓释双丙戊酸钠(DVPX)病情稳定近8年后出现中性粒细胞减少的情况。
一名45岁男性服用DVPX近8年,血清丙戊酸浓度为85 - 128mg/L,白细胞(WBC)计数和绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)正常。在中性粒细胞减少(定义为ANC<1800个细胞/微升)出现前5个月,患者的DVPX剂量减少250mg,变为每日早晨1250mg、晚上1500mg。该方案实施2个月后,DVPX剂量又增至每日两次,每次1500mg。剂量增加3个月后,患者的WBC计数降至3.7×10³/微升,ANC为1199个细胞/微升。尽管ANC低于1800个细胞/微升,但他没有出现与中性粒细胞减少相符的身体表现。停用DVPX,2周后患者的WBC计数为7.2×10³/微升,ANC为2290个细胞/微升。
尽管全血细胞计数及分类是DVPX治疗药物监测常用的一种形式,但这种监测被认为对于识别剂量相关的血小板减少最为必要。然而,中性粒细胞减少与DVPX的使用很少相关,且可能导致不同类型感染的发生,包括细菌、病毒或真菌来源的感染。尽管中性粒细胞减少一般程度较轻,但潜在严重的DVPX相关中性粒细胞减少可在治疗过程中的任何时间发生,不过在治疗的最初几个月最为常见。根据Naranjo概率量表,在本病例中,DVPX可能是中性粒细胞减少的原因。然而,该例中性粒细胞减少在发生和被发现的时间框架方面并不典型。尽管记录的实验室检查结果提示中性粒细胞减少,但患者并未因此出现任何临床并发症。该患者中性粒细胞减少的迟发性与文献中记载的其他病例不同。
无论患者处于治疗早期还是治疗多年后,血液学治疗药物监测在临床上仍然很重要。在该患者中,持续定期的治疗药物监测发现了疑似药物相关并发症,并且在未出现临床并发症的情况下停用了药物。